Files
zeekayandHanzo Dev 446e343a3d cd: annotations are cd.hanzo.ai, API group is apps.hanzo.ai
Two corrections on top of the naming pass, both found by checking the live
cluster rather than the source.

The rename had silently changed the user-facing annotation key from
argocd.argoproj.io/sync-wave to cd.argoproj.io/sync-wave — 63 live
Applications carry the old key, so deploying that would have ignored every
sync-wave and broken fleet deploy ordering. The key is now cd.hanzo.ai/*,
and universe 575650286 moves the ApplicationSet template that stamps it, so
the controller regenerates all 63 consistently.

The API group in code said argoproj.io/v1alpha1 in 157 places while the
cluster has served apps.hanzo.ai/v1alpha1 since 2026-07-23 (the CRDs are
applications.apps.hanzo.ai). Code now matches what is actually served.

The legacy applications.argoproj.io/app-name label had ZERO live users, so it
went with the rest. foo.argoproj.io test fixtures became foo.example.com —
arbitrary test domains should not carry a vendor name.

go build ./... exit 0.

Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
2026-07-28 16:32:14 -07:00

49 lines
2.3 KiB
YAML

tests:
- healthStatus:
status: Progressing
message: Waiting for the status to be reported
inputPath: testdata/progressing_no_status.yaml
- healthStatus:
status: Degraded
message: >-
NonCompliant; the policy spec is valid, the policy does not specify an
OperatorGroup but one already exists in the namespace - assuming that
OperatorGroup is correct, the Subscription required by the policy was
not found, there are no relevant InstallPlans in the namespace, the
ClusterServiceVersion required by the policy was not found, no CRDs were
found for the operator, there are no relevant deployments because the
ClusterServiceVersion is missing, CatalogSource was found
inputPath: testdata/degraded.yaml
- healthStatus:
status: Progressing
message: Waiting for the status to be updated
inputPath: testdata/progressing_old_generation.yaml
- healthStatus:
status: Progressing
message: Waiting for the compliance condition
inputPath: testdata/progressing_no_compliance.yaml
- healthStatus:
status: Healthy
message: >-
Compliant; the policy spec is valid, the policy does not specify an
OperatorGroup but one already exists in the namespace - assuming that
OperatorGroup is correct, the Subscription matches what is required by
the policy, no InstallPlans requiring approval were found,
ClusterServiceVersion (cd-operator.v0.11.0) - install strategy
completed with no errors, there are CRDs present for the operator, all
operator Deployments have their minimum availability, CatalogSource was
found
inputPath: testdata/healthy_no_generation.yaml
- healthStatus:
status: Healthy
message: >-
Compliant; the policy spec is valid, the policy does not specify an
OperatorGroup but one already exists in the namespace - assuming that
OperatorGroup is correct, the Subscription matches what is required by
the policy, no InstallPlans requiring approval were found,
ClusterServiceVersion (cd-operator.v0.11.0) - install strategy
completed with no errors, there are CRDs present for the operator, all
operator Deployments have their minimum availability, CatalogSource was
found
inputPath: testdata/healthy_with_generation.yaml