Files
chat/LICENSE
zeekayandHanzo Dev a035979e09 two files disagreed about this repo's licence
package.json said ISC. LICENSE said MIT. Both describe the same code, and a
partner's counsel greps the metadata, not the file.

MIT wins because LICENSE is the authoritative document and the text under that
heading is the MIT text.

Upstream's copyright line stays -- MIT requires it retained, and a fork that
drops it is the one failure worse than the fork itself. Ours sits beside it,
which is what a derivative work is supposed to look like: their notice, then
ours for what we added.

Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
2026-08-15 11:59:25 -07:00

23 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext

MIT License
Copyright (c) 2026 LibreChat
Copyright (c) 2026 Hanzo AI, Inc.
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
SOFTWARE.