hanzo-dev
c0d7b3f969
The document has always known a product's NAME mechanically — the first path segment after /v1/ — and never what the product IS. A caller reading the tag list, an agent reading the MCP door, a CLI printing `hanzo <product> --help` got 144 bare nouns. There is exactly one place that sentence is already written and already reviewed: the package doc of the package that implements the app. So this reads it rather than asking anyone to write it twice. openapi/synopsis.go Synopsis(plugin/<app>) -> the owning package's synopsis. describe.go stamps it into that app's own subset as info.description. openapi/weave.go lifts the tag prose off the subsets it already reads. ONE computation, at the one moment an app describes itself. The weave does not look the mapping up a second time in a second process — it reads the value the app that knows it already wrote down, which is why Weave stays a pure function of its parts. The owner comes from the app's own composition root: plugin/<app>/main.go imports exactly the package it mounts. Nothing else could be the source — four apps are not named after their package (audit->auditlog, evals->eval, plugins->plugin, zero-trust->zt) and one package backs two apps (account, account-bridge), so a name-derived guess is right 107 times and silently wrong 5. An app whose subsystem is another MODULE imports no package here and gets nothing, which is the honest answer. And the comment taken is the one that OPENS "Package …", not go/doc's first-file-in-filename-order fallback. Packages that open their alphabetically-first file with a note about that FILE and state the real package doc in <name>.go would otherwise publish "actions.go — the two GitOps write actions" as the deploy product's description. A misfiled sentence reads exactly like a real one; an absent one does not. 109 of 112 apps have a package doc; 85 of the 144 product tags gain a description. The three without are metrics, authz and licensing, whose subsystem is another module — there is no package here to read. The tag NAME is never conditional on a description: the list stays a function of the document's operations, so nothing enumerating products loses a product because nobody wrote a sentence. The fleet identity remains the fallback for a subset whose package has no doc, and the weave treats a part carrying it as having said nothing. THE LIFTED PROSE LOSES THE HANDLER'S OWN NAME, which is the other half of the same problem. A Go doc comment must open with the identifier it documents, and that identifier is Go's, not the document's: "GetSQL returns one database" reached the OpenAPI description, its summary, the MCP tool description an agent reads, and the CLI help line — naming a function no caller can see. zip drops an exact leading match of the handler's own name from v1.18.13 (main is on v1.18.14, whose lift is byte-identical), and nothing had regenerated against it: 35 packages carried prose the pinned zip can no longer produce. They regenerate here. Three test assertions quoted the leaked identifier and now quote the projection. Every generated artifact is regenerated FROM SOURCE (make -f mk/fleet.mk surface-check, green: 1017 paths). Nothing this commit does moves the wire: of openapi.yaml's 16,439 non-prose leaf facts, 0 changed. The 4 lost and 94 gained are all one thing — surface main already decided and never republished: /v1/insights/e removed and /v1/event given its declared body (6fc2d88c), the six project-scoped git smart-HTTP paths (811ff080), and the sessions' `terminal` property (afdda829). The three bare-root git paths reach no app, so they join router_test.go's unreachable ledger, recorded on the first regeneration that published them. Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <dev@hanzo.ai>
428 B
428 B