zeekayandhanzo-dev
21652f34be
CI/CD / image (push) Successful in 18m11s
CI/CD / gate (push) Successful in 19s
CI/CD / containment (push) Successful in 1m20s
Hanzo CI/CD / cicd (push) Successful in 19s
CI/CD / rollout (push) Failing after 6s
CI/CD / reach (push) Skipped
CI/CD / fanout (push) Skipped
CI/CD / receipt (push) Failing after 2s
commerce v1.50.7 added PUT /_/commerce/providers/{name} — the verb behind "a payment
rail can be turned on and off" — and the dep bump landed without prose for it, so
`commerce describe` refused and the app could not project its own document. The
subset is fail-closed, so nothing was written and the drift stayed invisible until
the next regeneration asked.
It gets the sentence, and the same gate its GET twin states: the tenant comes from
the IAM owner claim and nowhere else, so a cross-tenant write is not expressible;
404 for an unknown provider is byte-identical to the cross-tenant probe's answer. The
one thing worth saying that the shape does not: this owns a single bit and never the
credential, which is why a rail can come back with the same stored secret.
Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <dev@hanzo.ai>