Files
hanzo-dev 537d70b578
CI/CD / containment (push) Successful in 1m58s
Hanzo CI/CD / cicd (push) Failing after 22m32s
CI/CD / gate (push) Failing after 29m15s
CI/CD / image (push) Skipped
CI/CD / rollout (push) Skipped
CI/CD / reach (push) Skipped
CI/CD / fanout (push) Skipped
CI/CD / receipt (push) Skipped
commerce describes its generated resources, and one Artifact stops meaning two things
TWO THINGS STOOD BETWEEN THE FLEET DOCUMENT AND SOURCE, both revealed only once
licensing stopped failing first — surface-check stops at the first app that cannot
project, so everything behind it was invisible rather than passing.

commerce publishes 17 generated CRUD families over the same store, 7 operations
each: 119 sentences differing in one word. They are DERIVED now, for the reason
openapi.DescribeSPA derives the two SPA addresses — prose written 119 times drifts
119 ways, and the next family the module adds would arrive undescribed and stop the
gate again. Adding one is a line in `resources`. The vocabulary stays plain on
purpose: these are generic store resources, so each sentence states the shape (what
the address is, what the method does, what the id means) and stops. A resource that
earns its own prose keeps an explicit Describe above — Describe panics on a
duplicate, so the hand-written sentence and the loop cannot both claim an address.

The weave then refused for a different reason, and it was right to: schema
"Artifact" meant a RELEASE artifact in licensing (download_url, cosign_signature)
and a RESEARCH artifact in research (git_sha, run_id, retention_class). Schema names
are global in the woven document, so every generated SDK would have bound whichever
it read last — one name, two shapes, silently. research's is the one this repo owns,
so it becomes ResearchArtifact; licensing's stays, being the external module's.

Regenerated: openapi.yaml, the affected subsets and the floor.

Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <dev@hanzo.ai>
2026-08-05 17:12:37 -07:00
..