Files
dev/code-rs/execpolicy/tests/suite/cp.rs
T
zeekayandHanzo Dev 6cbbea2d03 merge: just-every/code v0.6.169 (e4fe007150) — keep Hanzo identity
Our history is just-every's with author emails rewritten, so the graphs are
disjoint and git finds no merge base. Supplied one by hand: d1f1f51a41, the
just-every commit matching our Oct-2025 fork point (22 files apart). 9618
upstream commits, 7004 files, +1.81M/-159k, 37 conflicts.

Resolution:
- Upstream code where our side was the Oct-2025 prototype of a feature they
  have since reimplemented 3-5x larger (agent_runs, browser_sessions,
  history_cell/{agent,browser}, the vt100 harness and its snapshots).
- Upstream's config.rs module split (builder/defaults/sources/validation)
  kept; zen5-coder and the provider-follows-model rule re-applied on top.
- Ours where the file IS the identity: README, package.json, postinstall,
  release notes pipeline, integration-zed.
- Hybrid where upstream improved a file we had branded: updates.rs (their
  release-repo migration, our hanzoai/dev), release.yml (their fail-fast npm
  auth check, our package name), chatwidget.rs (their turn handling, our
  HANZO_USER_KEY hint), exec human output (their 237 lines, our banner).

Superseded and dropped deliberately: our resume_command_name() coder-alias
hack — upstream's derive_resume_command_name() reads the invocation basename
generically, which yields "dev" for us.

LLM.md now records the real topology and the sync point; AGENTS.md and
CLAUDE.md are symlinks to it again. Single parent on purpose: adopting
jecode/main as a second parent would re-import 13,742 commits carrying the
upstream author emails a prior rewrite deliberately removed.

Version 0.2.188 -> 0.2.189.

Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
2026-08-05 23:09:12 -07:00

87 lines
2.2 KiB
Rust

extern crate codex_execpolicy;
use codex_execpolicy::ArgMatcher;
use codex_execpolicy::ArgType;
use codex_execpolicy::Error;
use codex_execpolicy::ExecCall;
use codex_execpolicy::MatchedArg;
use codex_execpolicy::MatchedExec;
use codex_execpolicy::Policy;
use codex_execpolicy::Result;
use codex_execpolicy::ValidExec;
use codex_execpolicy::get_default_policy;
#[expect(clippy::expect_used)]
fn setup() -> Policy {
get_default_policy().expect("failed to load default policy")
}
#[test]
fn test_cp_no_args() {
let policy = setup();
let cp = ExecCall::new("cp", &[]);
assert_eq!(
Err(Error::NotEnoughArgs {
program: "cp".to_string(),
args: vec![],
arg_patterns: vec![ArgMatcher::ReadableFiles, ArgMatcher::WriteableFile]
}),
policy.check(&cp)
)
}
#[test]
fn test_cp_one_arg() {
let policy = setup();
let cp = ExecCall::new("cp", &["foo/bar"]);
assert_eq!(
Err(Error::VarargMatcherDidNotMatchAnything {
program: "cp".to_string(),
matcher: ArgMatcher::ReadableFiles,
}),
policy.check(&cp)
);
}
#[test]
fn test_cp_one_file() -> Result<()> {
let policy = setup();
let cp = ExecCall::new("cp", &["foo/bar", "../baz"]);
assert_eq!(
Ok(MatchedExec::Match {
exec: ValidExec::new(
"cp",
vec![
MatchedArg::new(0, ArgType::ReadableFile, "foo/bar")?,
MatchedArg::new(1, ArgType::WriteableFile, "../baz")?,
],
&["/bin/cp", "/usr/bin/cp"]
)
}),
policy.check(&cp)
);
Ok(())
}
#[test]
fn test_cp_multiple_files() -> Result<()> {
let policy = setup();
let cp = ExecCall::new("cp", &["foo", "bar", "baz"]);
assert_eq!(
Ok(MatchedExec::Match {
exec: ValidExec::new(
"cp",
vec![
MatchedArg::new(0, ArgType::ReadableFile, "foo")?,
MatchedArg::new(1, ArgType::ReadableFile, "bar")?,
MatchedArg::new(2, ArgType::WriteableFile, "baz")?,
],
&["/bin/cp", "/usr/bin/cp"]
)
}),
policy.check(&cp)
);
Ok(())
}