Files
dev/codex-rs/execpolicy
zeekayandHanzo Dev 6cbbea2d03 merge: just-every/code v0.6.169 (e4fe007150) — keep Hanzo identity
Our history is just-every's with author emails rewritten, so the graphs are
disjoint and git finds no merge base. Supplied one by hand: d1f1f51a41, the
just-every commit matching our Oct-2025 fork point (22 files apart). 9618
upstream commits, 7004 files, +1.81M/-159k, 37 conflicts.

Resolution:
- Upstream code where our side was the Oct-2025 prototype of a feature they
  have since reimplemented 3-5x larger (agent_runs, browser_sessions,
  history_cell/{agent,browser}, the vt100 harness and its snapshots).
- Upstream's config.rs module split (builder/defaults/sources/validation)
  kept; zen5-coder and the provider-follows-model rule re-applied on top.
- Ours where the file IS the identity: README, package.json, postinstall,
  release notes pipeline, integration-zed.
- Hybrid where upstream improved a file we had branded: updates.rs (their
  release-repo migration, our hanzoai/dev), release.yml (their fail-fast npm
  auth check, our package name), chatwidget.rs (their turn handling, our
  HANZO_USER_KEY hint), exec human output (their 237 lines, our banner).

Superseded and dropped deliberately: our resume_command_name() coder-alias
hack — upstream's derive_resume_command_name() reads the invocation basename
generically, which yields "dev" for us.

LLM.md now records the real topology and the sync point; AGENTS.md and
CLAUDE.md are symlinks to it again. Single parent on purpose: adopting
jecode/main as a second parent would re-import 13,742 commits carrying the
upstream author emails a prior rewrite deliberately removed.

Version 0.2.188 -> 0.2.189.

Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
2026-08-05 23:09:12 -07:00
..

codex-execpolicy

Overview

  • Policy engine and CLI built around prefix_rule(pattern=[...], decision?, justification?, match?, not_match?) plus host_executable(name=..., paths=[...]).
  • This release covers the prefix-rule subset of the execpolicy language plus host executable metadata; a richer language will follow.
  • Tokens are matched in order; any pattern element may be a list to denote alternatives. decision defaults to allow; valid values: allow, prompt, forbidden.
  • justification is an optional human-readable rationale for why a rule exists. It can be provided for any decision and may be surfaced in different contexts (for example, in approval prompts or rejection messages). When decision = "forbidden" is used, include a recommended alternative in the justification, when appropriate (e.g., "Use `jj` instead of `git`.").
  • match / not_match supply example invocations that are validated at load time (think of them as unit tests); examples can be token arrays or strings (strings are tokenized with shlex).
  • The CLI always prints the JSON serialization of the evaluation result.

Policy shapes

  • Prefix rules use Starlark syntax:
prefix_rule(
    pattern = ["cmd", ["alt1", "alt2"]], # ordered tokens; list entries denote alternatives
    decision = "prompt",                 # allow | prompt | forbidden; defaults to allow
    justification = "explain why this rule exists",
    match = [["cmd", "alt1"], "cmd alt2"],           # examples that must match this rule
    not_match = [["cmd", "oops"], "cmd alt3"],       # examples that must not match this rule
)
  • Host executable metadata can optionally constrain which absolute paths may resolve through basename rules:
host_executable(
    name = "git",
    paths = [
        "/opt/homebrew/bin/git",
        "/usr/bin/git",
    ],
)
  • Matching semantics:
    • execpolicy always tries exact first-token matches first.
    • With host-executable resolution disabled, /usr/bin/git status only matches a rule whose first token is /usr/bin/git.
    • With host-executable resolution enabled, if no exact rule matches, execpolicy may fall back from /usr/bin/git to basename rules for git.
    • If host_executable(name="git", ...) exists, basename fallback is only allowed for listed absolute paths.
    • If no host_executable() entry exists for a basename, basename fallback is allowed.

CLI

  • From the Codex CLI, run codex execpolicy check subcommand with one or more policy files (for example src/default.rules) to check a command:
codex execpolicy check --rules path/to/policy.rules git status
  • To opt into basename fallback for absolute program paths, pass --resolve-host-executables:
codex execpolicy check \
  --rules path/to/policy.rules \
  --resolve-host-executables \
  /usr/bin/git status
  • Pass multiple --rules flags to merge rules, evaluated in the order provided, and use --pretty for formatted JSON.
  • You can also run the standalone dev binary directly during development:
cargo run -p codex-execpolicy -- check --rules path/to/policy.rules git status
  • Example outcomes:
    • Match: {"matchedRules":[{...}],"decision":"allow"}
    • No match: {"matchedRules":[]}

Response shape

{
  "matchedRules": [
    {
      "prefixRuleMatch": {
        "matchedPrefix": ["<token>", "..."],
        "decision": "allow|prompt|forbidden",
        "resolvedProgram": "/absolute/path/to/program",
        "justification": "..."
      }
    }
  ],
  "decision": "allow|prompt|forbidden"
}
  • When no rules match, matchedRules is an empty array and decision is omitted.
  • matchedRules lists every rule whose prefix matched the command; matchedPrefix is the exact prefix that matched.
  • resolvedProgram is omitted unless an absolute executable path matched via basename fallback.
  • The effective decision is the strictest severity across all matches (forbidden > prompt > allow).

Note: execpolicy commands are still in preview. The API may have breaking changes in the future.