Files
forge/models/perm/access/access_test.go
zeekayandHanzo Dev 9a07b4d089 legal: Hanzo AI, Inc. copyright above the upstream notices
2978 files. The fork is 2026-07-15 (rebrand: gitea.dev -> github.com/hanzoai/git),
so 2026 is the year, and "Copyright 2026 Hanzo AI, Inc." was already the form
used by the handful of files that had ours.

Shape is now:

	// Copyright 2026 Hanzo AI, Inc. All rights reserved.
	// Copyright 2015 The Gogs Authors. All rights reserved.
	// Copyright 2019 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
	// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT

Ours on top, theirs retained verbatim. Retained because MIT requires it, and
separately because they are true — those authors did write that code.

Not renamed to "The Git Authors": Git is a different project under a different
license, and putting its name here would attribute this code to people who have
nothing to do with it. Adding our line is the fix; overwriting theirs would have
been both a licence violation and a false statement.

gofmt still reports import-order drift in some of these files. It predates this
change (verified against a stash) and is left alone rather than burying a
one-line-per-file legal change under 3000 files of unrelated reordering.

Build clean.

Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
2026-07-27 13:49:52 -07:00

205 lines
7.9 KiB
Go

// Copyright 2026 Hanzo AI, Inc. All rights reserved.
// Copyright 2017 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package access_test
import (
"testing"
"github.com/hanzoai/git/models/db"
perm_model "github.com/hanzoai/git/models/perm"
access_model "github.com/hanzoai/git/models/perm/access"
repo_model "github.com/hanzoai/git/models/repo"
"github.com/hanzoai/git/models/unittest"
user_model "github.com/hanzoai/git/models/user"
"github.com/hanzoai/git/modules/setting"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
)
func TestAccess(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
t.Run("AccessLevel", testAccessLevel)
t.Run("HasAccess", testHasAccess)
t.Run("RecalculateAccesses", testRecalculateAccesses)
t.Run("RecalculateAccesses2", testRecalculateAccesses2)
t.Run("RecalculateAccessesUpdateMode", testRecalculateAccessesUpdateMode)
t.Run("RecalculateAccessesRemoveAccess", testRecalculateAccessesRemoveAccess)
}
func testAccessLevel(t *testing.T) {
user2 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
user5 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 5})
user29 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 29})
// A public repository owned by User 2
repo1 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 1})
assert.False(t, repo1.IsPrivate)
// A private repository owned by Org 3
repo3 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 3})
assert.True(t, repo3.IsPrivate)
// Another public repository
repo4 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 4})
assert.False(t, repo4.IsPrivate)
// org. owned private repo
repo24 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 24})
level, err := access_model.AccessLevel(t.Context(), user2, repo1)
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.Equal(t, perm_model.AccessModeOwner, level)
level, err = access_model.AccessLevel(t.Context(), user2, repo3)
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.Equal(t, perm_model.AccessModeOwner, level)
level, err = access_model.AccessLevel(t.Context(), user5, repo1)
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.Equal(t, perm_model.AccessModeRead, level)
level, err = access_model.AccessLevel(t.Context(), user5, repo3)
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.Equal(t, perm_model.AccessModeNone, level)
// restricted user has default access to a public repo if no sign-in is required
setting.Service.RequireSignInViewStrict = false
level, err = access_model.AccessLevel(t.Context(), user29, repo1)
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.Equal(t, perm_model.AccessModeRead, level)
// restricted user has no access to a public repo if sign-in is required
setting.Service.RequireSignInViewStrict = true
level, err = access_model.AccessLevel(t.Context(), user29, repo1)
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.Equal(t, perm_model.AccessModeNone, level)
// ... unless he's a collaborator
level, err = access_model.AccessLevel(t.Context(), user29, repo4)
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.Equal(t, perm_model.AccessModeWrite, level)
// ... or a team member
level, err = access_model.AccessLevel(t.Context(), user29, repo24)
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.Equal(t, perm_model.AccessModeRead, level)
}
func testHasAccess(t *testing.T) {
user1 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
user2 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 5})
// A public repository owned by User 2
repo1 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 1})
assert.False(t, repo1.IsPrivate)
// A private repository owned by Org 3
repo2 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 3})
assert.True(t, repo2.IsPrivate)
has, err := access_model.HasAnyUnitAccess(t.Context(), user1.ID, repo1)
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.True(t, has)
_, err = access_model.HasAnyUnitAccess(t.Context(), user1.ID, repo2)
assert.NoError(t, err)
_, err = access_model.HasAnyUnitAccess(t.Context(), user2.ID, repo1)
assert.NoError(t, err)
_, err = access_model.HasAnyUnitAccess(t.Context(), user2.ID, repo2)
assert.NoError(t, err)
}
func testRecalculateAccesses(t *testing.T) {
// test with organization repo
repo1 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 3})
assert.NoError(t, repo1.LoadOwner(t.Context()))
_, err := db.GetEngine(t.Context()).Delete(&repo_model.Collaboration{UserID: 2, RepoID: 3})
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.NoError(t, access_model.RecalculateAccesses(t.Context(), repo1))
access := &access_model.Access{UserID: 2, RepoID: 3}
has, err := db.GetEngine(t.Context()).Get(access)
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.True(t, has)
assert.Equal(t, perm_model.AccessModeOwner, access.Mode)
}
func testRecalculateAccesses2(t *testing.T) {
// test with non-organization repo
repo1 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 4})
assert.NoError(t, repo1.LoadOwner(t.Context()))
_, err := db.GetEngine(t.Context()).Delete(&repo_model.Collaboration{UserID: 4, RepoID: 4})
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.NoError(t, access_model.RecalculateAccesses(t.Context(), repo1))
has, err := db.GetEngine(t.Context()).Get(&access_model.Access{UserID: 4, RepoID: 4})
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.False(t, has)
}
func testRecalculateAccessesUpdateMode(t *testing.T) {
// Test the update path in refreshAccesses optimization
// Scenario: User's access mode changes from Read to Write
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 4})
assert.NoError(t, repo.LoadOwner(t.Context()))
// Verify initial access mode
_ = db.Insert(t.Context(), &repo_model.Collaboration{UserID: 4, RepoID: 4, Mode: perm_model.AccessModeWrite})
_ = db.Insert(t.Context(), &access_model.Access{UserID: 4, RepoID: 4, Mode: perm_model.AccessModeWrite})
initialAccess := &access_model.Access{UserID: 4, RepoID: 4}
has, err := db.GetEngine(t.Context()).Get(initialAccess)
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.True(t, has)
initialMode := initialAccess.Mode
// Change collaboration mode to trigger update path
newMode := perm_model.AccessModeAdmin
assert.NotEqual(t, initialMode, newMode, "New mode should differ from initial mode")
_, err = db.GetEngine(t.Context()).
Where("user_id = ? AND repo_id = ?", 4, 4).
Cols("mode").
Update(&repo_model.Collaboration{Mode: newMode})
assert.NoError(t, err)
// Recalculate accesses - should UPDATE existing access, not delete+insert
assert.NoError(t, access_model.RecalculateAccesses(t.Context(), repo))
// Verify access was updated, not deleted and re-inserted
updatedAccess := &access_model.Access{UserID: 4, RepoID: 4}
has, err = db.GetEngine(t.Context()).Get(updatedAccess)
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.True(t, has, "Access should still exist")
assert.Equal(t, newMode, updatedAccess.Mode, "Access mode should be updated to new collaboration mode")
}
func testRecalculateAccessesRemoveAccess(t *testing.T) {
// Test the delete path in refreshAccesses optimization
// Scenario: Remove a user's collaboration, access should be deleted
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 4})
assert.NoError(t, repo.LoadOwner(t.Context()))
// Verify initial access exists
initialAccess := &access_model.Access{UserID: 4, RepoID: 4}
has, err := db.GetEngine(t.Context()).Get(initialAccess)
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.True(t, has, "Access should exist initially")
// Remove the collaboration to trigger delete path
_, err = db.GetEngine(t.Context()).
Where("user_id = ? AND repo_id = ?", 4, 4).
Delete(&repo_model.Collaboration{})
assert.NoError(t, err)
// Recalculate accesses - should DELETE the access record
assert.NoError(t, access_model.RecalculateAccesses(t.Context(), repo))
// Verify access was deleted
removedAccess := &access_model.Access{UserID: 4, RepoID: 4}
has, err = db.GetEngine(t.Context()).Get(removedAccess)
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.False(t, has, "Access should be deleted after removing collaboration")
}