Files
zeekay 1b367e2b62 chore: rebase the tree onto upstream master
The tree was a debranded snapshot of upstream taken around 2026-02-20, and
upstream has moved about five months since. This replaces it with upstream
master, mechanically re-derived: bin/debrand does the rename, and the
pipeline and squashed migrations are restored from the shipped tree.

Not a merge. The previous import replaced the tree wholesale in a single
commit, so there is no shared content history to merge against. Reproducing
the rename on the new tree is what actually converges.

What survives: .hanzo/workflows, the Dockerfiles and bin/docker* entrypoints,
compose files, LLM.md, and insights/migrations. The squashed initial
migration is load-bearing — the live database records it by name, so
upstream's ~918 individual migrations cannot come back.

Nine products are dropped as unreferenced. Twenty-one more that we do not run
are kept anyway because the core app still imports them; unpicking those is a
refactor and does not belong in a rebase.

This base does not build yet, and the reasons are not in the rename:
upstream now wants Python 3.13.13 against our 3.12.12 and Django 5.2 against
our 4.2, and the dependency manifests still name upstream packages that we
republish under our own names. Those are decisions, not renames.
2026-08-01 15:44:40 -07:00

4.8 KiB

name, description
name description
ingestion-pipeline-doctor-nodejs Ingestion pipeline architecture overview and convention reference. Use when you need a quick orientation to the pipeline framework or want to know which doctor agent to use for a specific concern.

Pipeline Doctor

Quick reference for Insights's ingestion pipeline framework and its convention-checking agents.

Architecture overview

The ingestion pipeline processes events through a typed, composable step chain:

Kafka message
  → messageAware()
    → parse headers/body
    → sequentially() for preprocessing
    → filterMap() to enrich context (e.g., team lookup)
    → teamAware()
      → concurrentlyPerGroup(token:distinctId) for per-entity processing
      → gather()
      → pipeChunk() for chunk operations
      → handleIngestionWarnings()
    → handleResults()
  → handleSideEffects()
  → build()

See nodejs/src/ingestion/pipelines/analytics/joined-ingestion-pipeline.ts for the real implementation.

Key file locations

What Where
Step type nodejs/src/ingestion/framework/steps.ts
Result types nodejs/src/ingestion/framework/results.ts
Doc-test chapters nodejs/src/ingestion/framework/docs/*.test.ts
Joined pipeline nodejs/src/ingestion/pipelines/analytics/joined-ingestion-pipeline.ts
Doctor agents .claude/agents/ingestion/
Test helpers nodejs/src/ingestion/framework/docs/helpers.ts

Which agent to use

Concern Agent When to use
Step structure pipeline-step-doctor Factory pattern, type extension, config injection, naming
Result handling pipeline-result-doctor ok/dlq/drop/redirect, side effects, ingestion warnings
Composition pipeline-composition-doctor Builder chain, concurrency, grouping, branching, retries
Testing pipeline-testing-doctor Test helpers, assertions, fake timers, doc-test style

Quick convention reference

Steps: Factory function returning a named inner function. Generic <T extends Input> for type extension. No any. Config via closure.

Results: Use ok(), dlq(), drop(), redirect() constructors. Side effects as promises in ok(value, [effects]). Warnings as third parameter.

Composition: messageAware wraps the pipeline. handleResults inside messageAware. handleSideEffects after. concurrentlyPerGroup for per-entity work. gather before chunk steps.

Batching lifecycle hooks (BatchingPipeline beforeBatch/afterBatch): enrich-only. Hooks may enrich elements and batch context but must return exactly the elements they received — a count change is a broken invariant and feed() throws. Filtering belongs in sub-pipeline steps that return drop(). An empty feed() is a no-op (no hooks, no capacity). Details: nodejs/src/ingestion/framework/docs/14-batching.test.ts.

Fan-out/fan-in (fanOut(fn).via((sub) => …).fanIn(fn)): per-element sub-work with cardinality restored — one element fans out to N sub-elements (e.g. per-blob uploads), a regular sub-pipeline processes them (maxConcurrency on the sub concurrently block, retry on the per-sub step), and fan-in folds the OK results back into the parent. Reach for it over concurrently/concurrentlyPerGroup when the unit of concurrency is smaller than the element; hand-rolled p-limit/Promise.all inside a step is the tell. Sequencing is compile-time enforced (an unclosed stage cannot build). Sub-result contract: OK collected; DROP excludes the sub silently; DLQ fails the parent with aggregated reasons; REDIRECT is excluded with a warning — sub redirects never escape the stage. Sub-pipelines are context-agnostic: team/message data goes in the sub-element value, and context-gated surface (teamAware, handleIngestionWarnings, …) is uncallable. Fan-out/fan-in functions are cheap, synchronous, and named. Parents emit unordered as they complete. Details: nodejs/src/ingestion/framework/docs/17-fan-out-fan-in.test.ts.

Testing: Step tests call factory directly. Use consumeAll()/collectChunks() helpers. Fake timers for async. Type guards for result assertions. No any.

Running all doctors

Ask Claude to "run all pipeline doctors on my recent changes" to get a comprehensive review across all 4 concern areas.