Files
zeekay 1b367e2b62 chore: rebase the tree onto upstream master
The tree was a debranded snapshot of upstream taken around 2026-02-20, and
upstream has moved about five months since. This replaces it with upstream
master, mechanically re-derived: bin/debrand does the rename, and the
pipeline and squashed migrations are restored from the shipped tree.

Not a merge. The previous import replaced the tree wholesale in a single
commit, so there is no shared content history to merge against. Reproducing
the rename on the new tree is what actually converges.

What survives: .hanzo/workflows, the Dockerfiles and bin/docker* entrypoints,
compose files, LLM.md, and insights/migrations. The squashed initial
migration is load-bearing — the live database records it by name, so
upstream's ~918 individual migrations cannot come back.

Nine products are dropped as unreferenced. Twenty-one more that we do not run
are kept anyway because the core app still imports them; unpicking those is a
refactor and does not belong in a rebase.

This base does not build yet, and the reasons are not in the rename:
upstream now wants Python 3.13.13 against our 3.12.12 and Django 5.2 against
our 4.2, and the dependency manifests still name upstream packages that we
republish under our own names. Those are decisions, not renames.
2026-08-01 15:44:40 -07:00

146 lines
5.0 KiB
Python

"""Server-side formula evaluation over metric query clauses.
A formula combines clause results by name — `(a - b) / a` — evaluated
point-by-point on the shared time grid. Parsing is a tiny recursive-descent
parser (numbers, clause identifiers, + - * /, unary minus, parentheses);
nothing is ever eval()'d.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import re
from collections.abc import Mapping
_TOKEN_RE = re.compile(r"\s*(?:(?P<ident>[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]*)|(?P<number>\d+(?:\.\d+)?)|(?P<op>[()+\-*/]))")
# (kind, value) tuples; kind is "ident" | "number" | "op"
_Token = tuple[str, str]
def _tokenize(formula: str) -> list[_Token]:
tokens: list[_Token] = []
position = 0
while position < len(formula):
match = _TOKEN_RE.match(formula, position)
if match is None:
remainder = formula[position:].strip()
if not remainder:
break
raise ValueError(f"Unexpected character in formula: {remainder[0]!r}")
if match.group("ident"):
tokens.append(("ident", match.group("ident")))
elif match.group("number"):
tokens.append(("number", match.group("number")))
else:
tokens.append(("op", match.group("op")))
position = match.end()
return tokens
# Parsing (and later evaluation) recurse once per nesting level; cap it so
# a pathological formula raises ValueError -> 400 instead of RecursionError.
_MAX_NESTING_DEPTH = 32
class _Parser:
"""expr := term (('+'|'-') term)* ; term := factor (('*'|'/') factor)* ;
factor := NUMBER | IDENT | '(' expr ')' | '-' factor"""
def __init__(self, tokens: list[_Token], known_names: frozenset[str]) -> None:
self.tokens = tokens
self.position = 0
self.known_names = known_names
self.depth = 0
def parse(self) -> _Node:
node = self._expr()
if self.position < len(self.tokens):
raise ValueError(f"Unexpected token in formula: {self.tokens[self.position][1]!r}")
return node
def _peek(self) -> _Token | None:
return self.tokens[self.position] if self.position < len(self.tokens) else None
def _take(self) -> _Token:
token = self._peek()
if token is None:
raise ValueError("Unexpected end of formula")
self.position += 1
return token
def _expr(self) -> _Node:
node = self._term()
while (token := self._peek()) is not None and token[0] == "op" and token[1] in "+-":
self._take()
node = ("binop", token[1], node, self._term())
return node
def _term(self) -> _Node:
node = self._factor()
while (token := self._peek()) and token[0] == "op" and token[1] in "*/":
self._take()
node = ("binop", token[1], node, self._factor())
return node
def _factor(self) -> _Node:
if self.depth >= _MAX_NESTING_DEPTH:
raise ValueError(f"Formula nesting is too deep (maximum {_MAX_NESTING_DEPTH} levels)")
self.depth += 1
try:
token = self._take()
if token == ("op", "-"):
return ("neg", self._factor())
if token == ("op", "("):
node = self._expr()
closing = self._take()
if closing != ("op", ")"):
raise ValueError("Unbalanced parentheses in formula")
return node
if token[0] == "number":
return ("number", float(token[1]))
if token[0] == "ident":
if token[1] not in self.known_names:
raise ValueError(
f"Unknown clause {token[1]!r} in formula; available clauses: {sorted(self.known_names)}"
)
return ("ident", token[1])
raise ValueError(f"Unexpected token in formula: {token[1]!r}")
finally:
self.depth -= 1
# AST nodes are plain tuples: ("number", float) | ("ident", str) |
# ("neg", node) | ("binop", "+-*/", left, right)
_Node = tuple
def parse_formula(formula: str, known_names: frozenset[str]) -> _Node:
"""Parse and validate a formula; raises `ValueError` on any problem."""
tokens = _tokenize(formula)
if not tokens:
raise ValueError("Formula is empty")
return _Parser(tokens, known_names).parse()
def evaluate(node: _Node, values: Mapping[str, float]) -> float:
"""Evaluate one grid point. Division by zero yields 0.0 — charts and
alert thresholds want a number, not a NaN hole."""
kind = node[0]
if kind == "number":
return node[1]
if kind == "ident":
return values[node[1]]
if kind == "neg":
return -evaluate(node[1], values)
operator, left_node, right_node = node[1], node[2], node[3]
left, right = evaluate(left_node, values), evaluate(right_node, values)
if operator == "+":
return left + right
if operator == "-":
return left - right
if operator == "*":
return left * right
if right == 0.0:
return 0.0
return left / right