Every author block and the authorship standard said Los Angeles; Hanzo has
been in San Francisco since at least 2016. The five catalogue PDFs whose
sources changed are rebuilt so papers.hanzo.ai says so too.
Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
Bylines, paper authorship, correspondence addresses and the founder blurb under
each post named an individual. They name the organisation that published the
work instead: the brand on posts and pages, the research byline on papers, and
research@ in place of a personal address. Both are what these repositories
already used elsewhere — nothing new was coined.
Co-authors are untouched. Where a paper named someone else alongside, they stay
named; only the one byline changed. Bibliography entries, running heads,
PDF metadata and affiliations move with it, so a citation still resolves to
whoever the cited paper names.
Sample and fixture data uses the placeholder name these tests already use
elsewhere, so no assertion changed meaning.
Two papers were missing and four understated what we already run.
mechanism the Hamiltonian market maker: price as position under a
regime-dependent anharmonic potential, symplectic so it does not
drift on noise, regime recovered as the latent state of a hidden
Markov model, per-resource states whose prices never cross, one-bit
tenant preference deltas, quotes deterministic given job and market.
States plainly why a constant-product curve cannot express
perishability, deadline pressure or scarcity convexity.
training training and data as market workloads over open weights: the
tradable units and their properties, gradient verification, the
four confidential-compute tiers with local attestation, and
train-without-transfer for weights and corpora that may not be
copied.
soundness attested execution rewritten. At a few percent overhead it is the
default for everything byte equality cannot reach, not a curiosity;
paired with algebraic spot-checks it beats replication on both cost
and coverage.
clearing the pricing layer and the learned per-request router are existing
systems, not proposals; open weights are what a provider network can
actually schedule.
residency the shared-object-plus-tiny-delta pattern appears at the pricing
layer too, and where the analogy stops is the interesting part.
surplus verification for the nondeterministic majority, and training and
data, as sized surplus lines; three additions to the risk register.
zeekayandHanzo Dev