mirror of
https://github.com/hanzoai/papers.git
synced 2026-10-22 17:20:17 +00:00
65 lines
1.4 KiB
TeX
65 lines
1.4 KiB
TeX
\section{Evaluation}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Prediction Performance}
|
|
|
|
\begin{table}[h]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\caption{Model Performance Metrics}
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
|
|
\toprule
|
|
\textbf{Model} & \textbf{AUC} & \textbf{Precision} & \textbf{Recall} & \textbf{F1} \\
|
|
\midrule
|
|
Purchase (7-day) & 0.89 & 0.42 & 0.71 & 0.53 \\
|
|
Purchase (30-day) & 0.86 & 0.38 & 0.68 & 0.49 \\
|
|
Churn (90-day) & 0.84 & 0.56 & 0.73 & 0.63 \\
|
|
\bottomrule
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
\end{table}
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Segmentation Quality}
|
|
|
|
Segmentation quality measured by:
|
|
|
|
\begin{equation}
|
|
Silhouette = \frac{b - a}{\max(a, b)}
|
|
\end{equation}
|
|
|
|
where $a$ is mean intra-cluster distance and $b$ is mean nearest-cluster distance.
|
|
|
|
Our behavioral segmentation achieves silhouette score of 0.67, compared to 0.41 for demographic-only segmentation.
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Business Impact}
|
|
|
|
\begin{table}[h]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\caption{Business Outcomes}
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lcc}
|
|
\toprule
|
|
\textbf{Metric} & \textbf{Before} & \textbf{After} \\
|
|
\midrule
|
|
Campaign ROI & 1.8x & 4.1x \\
|
|
Churn Rate (90-day) & 23\% & 17\% \\
|
|
Reactivation Rate & 8\% & 19\% \\
|
|
LTV Accuracy & $\pm$32\% & $\pm$14\% \\
|
|
\bottomrule
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
\end{table}
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Latency Performance}
|
|
|
|
\begin{table}[h]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\caption{Prediction Latency}
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lcc}
|
|
\toprule
|
|
\textbf{Percentile} & \textbf{Feature Fetch} & \textbf{Prediction} \\
|
|
\midrule
|
|
P50 & 8ms & 3ms \\
|
|
P95 & 23ms & 8ms \\
|
|
P99 & 45ms & 15ms \\
|
|
\bottomrule
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
\end{table}
|
|
|