Files
papers/hanzo-harness-hacking/sections/14-benchmark-task-breakdown.tex

29 lines
939 B
TeX

\section{Benchmark Task Breakdown}
\label{app:benchmark}
\begin{table}[H]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{lcccc}
\toprule
Task Category & $N$ & Gen.\ Tool & No Gen.\ Tool & Delta \\
\midrule
File manipulation & 85 & 96.5\% & 88.2\% & +8.3\% \\
API integration & 110 & 94.5\% & 83.6\% & +10.9\% \\
Code refactoring & 95 & 91.6\% & 81.1\% & +10.5\% \\
Data transformation & 80 & 93.8\% & 85.0\% & +8.8\% \\
System configuration & 65 & 92.3\% & 82.0\% & +10.3\% \\
Documentation & 65 & 89.2\% & 82.0\% & +7.2\% \\
\midrule
\textbf{Overall} & \textbf{500} & \textbf{93.1\%} & \textbf{83.8\%} & \textbf{+9.3\%} \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\caption{Per-category breakdown of the specific-tools advantage.
The gap is largest for API integration (+10.9\%) and smallest for
documentation generation (+7.2\%), consistent with the intuition
that structured, programmatic tasks benefit most from purpose-built
tools.}
\label{tab:breakdown}
\end{table}