papers/hanzo-identity-nft/sections/06-evaluation.tex

\section{Evaluation}


\subsection{Deployment Statistics}

\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\caption{First-month deployment metrics.}
\label{tab:deployment}
\begin{tabular}{lr}
\toprule
\textbf{Metric} & \textbf{Value} \\
\midrule
Total Identities Claimed & 52,340 \\
Unique Owners & 41,892 \\
Total Value Locked & \$2.1M \\
Average Stake & 847 AI \\
Referral Rate & 34\% \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}

\subsection{Name Length Distribution}

\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\caption{Identity claims by name length.}
\label{tab:length}
\begin{tabular}{lrr}
\toprule
\textbf{Length} & \textbf{Count} & \textbf{Percentage} \\
\midrule
1 char & 12 & 0.02\% \\
2 chars & 89 & 0.17\% \\
3 chars & 1,234 & 2.36\% \\
4 chars & 8,456 & 16.16\% \\
5+ chars & 42,549 & 81.29\% \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}

The pricing model effectively creates scarcity: only 0.02\% of claims are single-character names despite their memorability premium.

\subsection{Gas Costs}

\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\caption{Gas costs for registry operations.}
\label{tab:gas}
\begin{tabular}{lr}
\toprule
\textbf{Operation} & \textbf{Gas (units)} \\
\midrule
claimIdentity & 312,000 \\
setKeys & 89,000 \\
increaseStake & 67,000 \\
setDelegations (3 delegatees) & 145,000 \\
unclaimIdentity & 98,000 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}

\subsection{Comparison with Alternatives}

\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\caption{Feature comparison with identity systems.}
\label{tab:compare}
\begin{tabular}{lcccc}
\toprule
\textbf{Feature} & \textbf{Ours} & \textbf{ENS} & \textbf{UD} & \textbf{HNS} \\
\midrule
Multi-chain & Yes & No & Yes & No \\
Staking & Yes & No & No & Yes \\
Delegation & Yes & No & No & No \\
Governance & Yes & Yes & No & Yes \\
One-time cost & Yes & No & Yes & Yes \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}