papers/ntt-transform/sections/09-comparison-with-other-chains.tex

\section{Comparison with Other Chains}


\subsection{Ethereum}

\begin{itemize}
\item \textbf{Status}: No native NTT support
\item \textbf{Post-quantum readiness}: Requires EIP adoption
\item \textbf{Current approach}: Smart contract implementations (expensive)
\end{itemize}

\subsection{Solana}

\begin{itemize}
\item \textbf{Architecture}: BPF virtual machine
\item \textbf{Advantages}: Lower-level access, better performance
\item \textbf{Limitations}: Limited post-quantum research
\item \textbf{NTT support}: Possible but not standardized
\end{itemize}

\subsection{Algorand}

\begin{itemize}
\item \textbf{Approach}: State proofs with post-quantum signatures
\item \textbf{Technology}: SPHINCS+ variant
\item \textbf{Limitation}: Not EVM-compatible
\item \textbf{Performance}: Native implementation (faster)
\end{itemize}

\subsection{Lux Network}

\begin{itemize}
\item \textbf{Status}: First EVM chain with production NTT
\item \textbf{Implementation}: Optimized precompiles
\item \textbf{Algorithms}: FALCON, Dilithium, SPHINCS+
\item \textbf{Advantage}: Full backward compatibility
\end{itemize}