Files
zeekay 219e7535aa Publish the memory paper, with the comparison it can now make
The benchmark paper was built and never published: papers.hanzo.ai served 32 of
the 50 PDFs in this repo and not this one, so the results every table in it
carries were not downloadable by anyone.

It is in site/public/pdfs and in the site manifest now, and the tables it inputs
are regenerated from the current runs. Two of those runs finished today after
four days unable to authenticate, so locomo-answers gains its oracle rows and
loses two partials that were flattering — enso-flash read 54.6 F1 at n=57 and
reads 45.1 at n=282.

The substantive change is to what the paper may claim. Naive's 91 / 57 was
described here as circulating without a published method, not locatable, and not
cited. It is published, at usenaive.ai/lab/memory, and although that page names
no dataset it is identifiable from its own comparison column: its baselines are
CAR's to the decimal, 78.0 / 30.2 and 54, 28, 18, 7, with the multi-hop scores
collapsed into one "<=7%". A table is identified by its baselines.

So the benchmark is MemoryAgentBench FactConsolidation, which this paper already
reports, and the comparison is ours: 98.3 / 84.5 with no reader against their
91 / 57 on a matched gpt-4o-mini backbone, +7.3 single-hop and +27.5 multi-hop.
Their per-lane split and protocol are unpublished, so it is pooled figures being
compared and the paper says so.
2026-09-15 10:52:42 -07:00

18 lines
1.4 KiB
TeX

% generated by hanzoai/cloud bench/brain/tables.mjs — runs/mab-*; substring exact match; 6k is the dev split, the rest test; pooled = mean of the four sizes as CAR reports
\begin{tabular}{lrrrrrrrrrr}
\toprule
& \multicolumn{5}{c}{FC-SH} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{FC-MH} \\
\cmidrule(lr){2-6}\cmidrule(lr){7-11}
Configuration (reader) & 6k & 32k & 64k & 262k & pooled & 6k & 32k & 64k & 262k & pooled \\
\midrule
resolver, latest wins (no reader) & 96.0 & 97.0 & 95.0 & 94.0 & 95.5 & 76.0 & 59.0 & 59.0 & 33.0 & 56.8 \\
typed search over the plans (no reader) & 98.0 & 97.0 & 97.0 & 94.0 & 96.5 & 88.0 & 87.0 & 84.0 & 64.0 & 80.8 \\
typed search, exhaustive, lexical tie-break (no reader) & 100.0 & 98.0 & 98.0 & 97.0 & 98.3 & 93.0 & 89.0 & 89.0 & 67.0 & 84.5 \\
typed search with one repair call (no reader) & 98.0 & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & 89.0 & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots \\
\midrule
\multicolumn{11}{l}{CAR (arXiv 2606.01435), pooled 6k--262k: 78.0 / 30.2 with gpt-4o-mini, 94.8 / 51.5 with gpt-4o; at 262k: 82 / 27 and 93 / 41} \\
\multicolumn{11}{l}{Na\"ive Brain, \texttt{usenaive.ai/lab/memory} (read 2026-09-15, dated July 2026), pooled: 91 / 57 on a matched gpt-4o-mini backbone} \\
\multicolumn{11}{l}{\quad that page names no dataset; it is identified as this one by its baselines, which are CAR's to the decimal --- 78.0/30.2, 54, 28, 18, 7} \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}