The name table of Zen-Variable.woff2 read "Geist" and ZenMono-Variable.woff2
read "Geist Mono". The filename, the @font-face and the licence beside them all
said Zen; only the bytes disagreed, so every grep passed and the surface
rendered Vercel's face.
This is the fourth instance in the estate — @hanzo/design shipped the same thing
under the same filename, zoo's foundation declared Zen over inter-var-latin,
and hanzo.sh had Zen declared over a Geist file. A filename proves nothing; the
check is the name table:
python3 -c "from fontTools.ttLib import TTFont; print(TTFont(P)[\"name\"].getDebugName(1))"
The bytes are @hanzo/font 1.9.2's now, verified that way: family Zen and Zen
Mono. LICENSE-Zen.txt beside them already carried both copyright holders, which
is what OFL §2 asks of the copy that travels.
The filenames read Zen-*.woff2 and the glyphs are right; only the name
table said family='Geist', designer='Basement.studio, Andres Briganti,
Mateo Zaragoza', vendorURL=basement.studio. Nothing visual can see that —
a font picker, a local() match and a licence audit can.
Replaced with the corrected bytes from hanzoai/font, matched by glyph
content rather than by filename, so the drawing is provably the same face.
zeekay