I tried to add a temporary check for the correct state in https://gist.github.com/spicyj/338147e989215b6eeaf48a6ce2d68d93 and run our test suites over it, but none of our existing test cases would have triggered that invariant. The new one I added does.
We're walking backwards up to the root to find the parent so that we can
propagate events further up to nested React parents. If we don't find a
root, that means that the tree was unmounted and we shouldn't send any
events to it.
This was supposed to fix an issue in refs-test but instead it revealed that
this strategy is broken.
The problem is that Placement effect is not sufficient when the insertion
is completed since the effect flag is reset then and the previous tree
has no effects in it to indicate that this is the wrong tree.
If there is no child there is nothing to tell us that this was the
workInProgress branch. Therefore, we need to look at the other branch
if there are children in it to see if *that* was the workInProgress branch.
We've already been warning for mutating styles so now we'll freeze them
in DEV instead. This isn't as good because we don't have more specific
warnings than the generic error that doesn't even fire in sloppy mode.
This lets Fiber pass the same tests.
This used to be done at the end of the transaction but I made it synchronous.
For this to work it needs to be applied after we have already set the .type
property since it is read by inputValueTracker.
We need this to safely extract the current event listeners from the props.
Unfortunately, we are still not safe to use the return pointer since it
may not point to the current tree when the Fiber is reused. So this is not
fully done yet.
* Use the public ReactDOMServer in tests
We need this because it runs the injection.
* Let Fiber skip react data attributes and comments in SSR tests
This markup is testing implementation details rather than behavior.
* [Fiber] Add ReactDOMFiber.unstable_createPortal()
While #8368 added a version of `ReactDOM.unstable_renderSubtreeIntoContainer()` to Fiber, it is a bit hacky and, more importantly, incompatible with Fiber goals. Since it encourages performing portal work in lifecycles, it stretches the commit phase and prevents slicing that work, potentially negating Fiber benefits.
This PR adds a first version of a declarative API meant to replace `ReactDOM.unstable_renderSubtreeIntoContainer()`. The API is a declarative way to render subtrees into DOM node containers.
* Remove hacks related to output field
* Update all Jest packages to 17.x, cache babel-jest transforms
* Remove the caching
Looking at the other builds it doesn't seem to actually be that necessary. The bottleneck is executors, not build time.
* Remove unnecessary package, fix fiber test runner
* Regenerate yarn lockfile
I forgot that the normal properties route doesn't do this. We also have
to make sure that the order is 1) insert children (options), 2) set
multiple 3) update the options.
* Update ESLint to 3.10.2
Also pull in fbjs for extending properly, per @zpao. This also disables consistent-return, which has about 80 failing cases in React currently. If we'd like to turn this back on, we should do it separately and fix all the call sites properly (rather than just adding 'return undefined;' everywhere, which adds no value.
Fixes to all existing lint errors plus an update for yarn.lock to follow.
* Update yarn.lock after the eslint update.
* Fix all new eslint failures
Unfortunately I had to add three eslint-disable-next-line instances. All have explanations inline.
* Switch Travis to use yarn instead of npm
This traverses parent based on the type of internal instance it is passed.
If it is a Fiber it may have to traverse multiple steps until it finds a
HostComponent.
This will allow us to use the event system with Fiber.
This adds precaching to ReactDOMFiber. I.e. adding a handle from the DOM
node to the internal Fiber. This means that we need to expose an internal
handle to the reconciler.
We use duck typing to figure out if it is a Fiber or Stack instance.
The new failing tests are failing because this is now able to actually
fire events onto Fibers and then the result of those events are
incorrect where as they were ignored before.
* Reapply Check for event listener in props instead of bank (#8192)
This reverts the previous revert.
* Don't throw on falsy event listeners
Some code relies on passing null. This restores the earlier behavior.
This matches Stack behavior.
Had to rewrite a test that used Simulate because Fiber doesn't support events yet.
Also changed tests for componentDidUpdate() since Fiber intentionally doesn't pass prevContext argument.
It is error-prone to push and pop context in begin or complete phases because of all the bailouts. Scheduler has enough knowledge to see if pushing is necessary because it knows when we go inside or outside the tree.
I'll plan to change all of our console.error and component-tree expects to expectDev. It's a little annoying that we need to make sure tests don't throw (see my change to normalizeCodeLocInfo) but any alternative would seem to require two separate test runs or a much more cumbersome syntax.
* Handles risky callbacks on setState. Fixes#8238
* Updates try-catch to cover `callback` when context is not present.
* Updates code to trapErrors instead of swallowing them.
* Fixes flow errors
* Incorporates review comments
* Traps only the first error.
Removes `callbackWasCalled` and updates fiber tests.
I came up with a contrived case of where nested controlled events could
fire within the same batch - but on different targets.
I think we came to the conclusion that controlled values typically cannot
use preventDefault so it is ok that they don't flush until after the event
has finished. So therefore we accumulate a queue of all the nested targets
within a batch and then restore state on all of them.
I'm still skeptical that this is the correct way to do controlled values.
The reason we have to do them in a single event loop is because when you
type, the sequence of values that get accepted or not can matter. I wonder
if there is a scenario we can come up with where you can fire multiple
inner events in an event loop and end up with batching causing problems.
This effectively just reimplements asap again but with no allocations for
a single target and no closure allocations.
* Use _hostContainerInfo to track test renderer options
The transaction is not available when unmounting or updating the
instance, so we track it using _hostContainerInfo
* Throw if hostContainerInfo is not populated in getPublicInstance
* Linting fixes
* Remove transaction from ref lifecycle code path
We don't need to pass the transaction around anymore since we store the
test options on _hostContainerInfo instead
* Remove unused argument
If a controlled target fires within another controlled event, we should not
restore it until we've fully completed the event. Otherwise, if someone
reads from it afterwards, they'll get the restored value.
Not super happy with this particular solution.
Ben Alpert