Files
s3/weed/mq/kafka/protocol/topic_autocreate_test.go
zooqueen dd74d3e6d6 Replace AGPL MinIO fork with Apache-2.0 SeaweedFS fork; rebrand CLI weed->s3
hanzoai/s3 was an AGPL-3.0 MinIO fork whose network-copyleft blocks embedding
and reselling as a managed service. Replace it wholesale with a fork of
SeaweedFS (github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs, Apache-2.0, Go) which ships a
built-in S3 gateway + Filer.

- License: AGPL-3.0 -> Apache-2.0 (upstream LICENSE kept verbatim, incl.
  "Copyright 2025 Chris Lu"); NOTICE added crediting SeaweedFS. No AGPL/BUSL/
  SSPL/GPL or enterprise ("ee") files remain.
- Module: go.mod path set to github.com/hanzoai/s3 with a self-replace
  (replace github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs => ./) so the ~1800 internal Go files
  keep their upstream import paths with zero churn. Internal identifiers and
  import paths are intentionally NOT renamed.
- CLI rebrand: the binary is built as `s3` (was `weed`); root usage, per-command
  help/usage/flag strings, shell autocomplete program name, and the product name
  in CLI output now read "Hanzo S3" / `s3`. Users never see `weed`.
  (e.g. `s3 server`, `s3 filer`, `s3 master`, `s3 volume`, `s3 s3`, `s3 mount`.)
- Build: `make` (or `go build -o s3 ./weed`) builds the `s3` binary green;
  `cmd/weed-db` and `cmd/weed-sql` also build; `go vet ./weed/command/` clean.
- README/LLM.md rewritten for Hanzo S3; AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md symlinks preserved.
- Dropped a 33MB prebuilt Mach-O `stress` binary upstream had committed; `.gitignore`
  updated to ignore the `s3` build output.
2026-06-18 23:41:25 -07:00

75 lines
2.6 KiB
Go

package protocol
import (
"fmt"
"testing"
"github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/weed/mq/kafka/integration"
)
// autoCreateMockHandler models the flaky-existence scenario: TopicExists reports
// the topic missing (a transient broker/filer false-negative), while a create
// attempt reports the topic already exists. It reuses FastMockHandler for the
// rest of the interface and overrides only the two methods under test.
type autoCreateMockHandler struct {
*FastMockHandler
exists bool
createErr error
}
func (h *autoCreateMockHandler) TopicExists(name string) bool { return h.exists }
func (h *autoCreateMockHandler) CreateTopic(name string, partitions int32) error {
return h.createErr
}
// TestEnsureTopicExistsTreatsAlreadyExistsAsSuccess reproduces the offset-resumption
// flake: TopicExists returns a false-negative for a topic that is in fact present,
// so the auto-create attempt fails with ErrTopicAlreadyExists. The topic must still
// be reported as existing, otherwise the client sees UNKNOWN_TOPIC_OR_PARTITION.
func TestEnsureTopicExistsTreatsAlreadyExistsAsSuccess(t *testing.T) {
handler := &Handler{
seaweedMQHandler: &autoCreateMockHandler{
FastMockHandler: &FastMockHandler{},
exists: false,
createErr: fmt.Errorf("%s: %w", "offset-resumption", integration.ErrTopicAlreadyExists),
},
}
if !handler.ensureTopicExists("offset-resumption", 1) {
t.Fatal("ensureTopicExists must report true when the create attempt finds the topic already exists")
}
}
// TestEnsureTopicExistsReportsGenuineFailure confirms a real create failure (not
// "already exists") still results in the topic being treated as absent.
func TestEnsureTopicExistsReportsGenuineFailure(t *testing.T) {
handler := &Handler{
seaweedMQHandler: &autoCreateMockHandler{
FastMockHandler: &FastMockHandler{},
exists: false,
createErr: fmt.Errorf("broker unavailable"),
},
}
if handler.ensureTopicExists("missing-topic", 1) {
t.Fatal("ensureTopicExists must report false when the topic is absent and creation genuinely fails")
}
}
// TestEnsureTopicExistsWhenPresent covers the common path where the topic is
// already known to exist and no create attempt is needed.
func TestEnsureTopicExistsWhenPresent(t *testing.T) {
handler := &Handler{
seaweedMQHandler: &autoCreateMockHandler{
FastMockHandler: &FastMockHandler{},
exists: true,
createErr: fmt.Errorf("CreateTopic should not be called when the topic exists"),
},
}
if !handler.ensureTopicExists("present-topic", 1) {
t.Fatal("ensureTopicExists must report true for an existing topic")
}
}