Files
zeekay 1df3ddf6bd Regenerate against the document the deployment answers for
The projection these were generated from predated the compute migration, so
they described /v1/visor — which the API serves at zero paths now.

No /v1/visor path survives here.
2026-09-05 18:55:38 -07:00

51 lines
3.9 KiB
Swift

//
// Capabilities.swift
//
// Generated by openapi-generator
// https://openapi-generator.tech
//
import Foundation
public struct Capabilities: Sendable, Codable, ParameterConvertible, Hashable {
/** Actions is whether the transport renders an INTERACTIVE control natively, and it is the flag to read before composing one. The vocabulary is a closed kind-tagged union (envelope.go), exactly four kinds, each carrying only its own field plus an optional label: command — a bot command to run (`command`), rendered as a button that invokes it. url — an external link (`url`), rendered as a link button. select — a menu (`options`, each a label and the value choosing it returns), rendered as a picker. approval — a reference to an approval request (`approval.id`), rendered as approve/deny controls bound to that id. False on every transport, and nothing refuses a send for it: actions are accepted, validated per kind, and flattened by renderText to one line each after the text — `[label] command`, `[label] url`, `[label] opt | opt`, `[label] approval requested: <id>`. So a caller that needs a real control must read this flag and degrade itself; a caller that only needs the choice communicated can send actions and take the text form. */
public var actions: Bool?
/** DM is whether the transport carries a DIRECT message at all. True for slack, teams, telegram and whatsapp — whatsapp is nothing else, since the Cloud API addresses a person's number and there is no room a third party joins. False for discord, honestly: that ingress is guild-scoped slash commands — an interaction without a guild id is refused at the endpoint — so nothing ever arrives classified as a DM, no reply route is ever learned for one, and a send addressed at a Discord DM is refused 409. */
public var dm: Bool?
/** Group is whether the transport carries multi-person rooms — a Discord guild channel, a Slack channel, a Teams channel or group chat, a Telegram group or supergroup. False on whatsapp alone, which has no such room to carry. */
public var group: Bool?
/** Media is whether the transport renders an ATTACHMENT natively. False everywhere, and a send is not refused for it: renderText flattens each attachment to one `kind: url (mime)` line after the text rather than dropping it. A transport whose egress passes the raw text straight through would drop the attachment instead, and an attachment-only send would reach the platform with nothing to say — which is why the flag and the flattening are pinned together. */
public var media: Bool?
/** Thread is whether a reply can be threaded UNDER a specific message. True for slack alone: it is the only transport whose ingress reports a thread (thread_ts, published as the envelope's replyTo) and whose send posts back into it. Discord's replyTo makes an inline reply rather than a thread, Telegram's and WhatsApp's each quote one message, and Teams carries no reply target at all — a replyTo sent to it is ignored. */
public var thread: Bool?
public init(actions: Bool? = nil, dm: Bool? = nil, group: Bool? = nil, media: Bool? = nil, thread: Bool? = nil) {
self.actions = actions
self.dm = dm
self.group = group
self.media = media
self.thread = thread
}
public enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey, CaseIterable {
case actions
case dm
case group
case media
case thread
}
// Encodable protocol methods
public func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
var container = encoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
try container.encodeIfPresent(actions, forKey: .actions)
try container.encodeIfPresent(dm, forKey: .dm)
try container.encodeIfPresent(group, forKey: .group)
try container.encodeIfPresent(media, forKey: .media)
try container.encodeIfPresent(thread, forKey: .thread)
}
}