mirror of
https://github.com/hanzoai/tasks.git
synced 2026-11-03 03:56:04 +00:00
## What changed? Integrate Go 1.26's new `go fix` into workflow. NOTE that the changes caused our linter to fire; a [separate commit](https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/pull/9337/commits/1b23f787aef370098b35829c4d17dcc06230b4c1) addresses those. ## Why? Ensure Go code is standardized/modernized. ## How did you test it? - [ ] built - [ ] run locally and tested manually - [x] covered by existing tests - [ ] added new unit test(s) - [ ] added new functional test(s)
103 lines
2.1 KiB
Go
103 lines
2.1 KiB
Go
package locks
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"sync"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
type (
|
|
// HashFunc represents a hash function for string
|
|
HashFunc func(any) uint32
|
|
|
|
// IDMutex is an interface which can lock on specific comparable identifier
|
|
IDMutex interface {
|
|
LockID(identifier any)
|
|
UnlockID(identifier any)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// idMutexShardImpl is the implementation of IDMutex shard
|
|
idMutexImpl struct {
|
|
numShard uint32
|
|
hashFn HashFunc
|
|
shards map[uint32]*idMutexShardImpl
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// idMutexShardImpl is the implementation of IDMutex shard
|
|
idMutexShardImpl struct {
|
|
sync.Mutex
|
|
mutexInfos map[any]*mutexInfo
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mutexInfo struct {
|
|
// how many caller are using this lock info, including the
|
|
// the caller already have the lock
|
|
// this is guarded by lock in idLockImpl
|
|
waitCount int
|
|
|
|
// actual lock
|
|
sync.Mutex
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// NewIDMutex create a new IDLock
|
|
func NewIDMutex(numShard uint32, hashFn HashFunc) IDMutex {
|
|
impl := &idMutexImpl{
|
|
numShard: numShard,
|
|
hashFn: hashFn,
|
|
shards: make(map[uint32]*idMutexShardImpl),
|
|
}
|
|
for i := range numShard {
|
|
impl.shards[i] = &idMutexShardImpl{
|
|
mutexInfos: make(map[any]*mutexInfo),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return impl
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func newMutexInfo() *mutexInfo {
|
|
return &mutexInfo{
|
|
waitCount: 1,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// LockID lock by specific identifier
|
|
func (idMutex *idMutexImpl) LockID(identifier any) {
|
|
shard := idMutex.shards[idMutex.getShardIndex(identifier)]
|
|
|
|
shard.Lock()
|
|
mutexInfo, ok := shard.mutexInfos[identifier]
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
mutexInfo := newMutexInfo()
|
|
shard.mutexInfos[identifier] = mutexInfo
|
|
shard.Unlock()
|
|
mutexInfo.Lock()
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mutexInfo.waitCount++
|
|
shard.Unlock()
|
|
mutexInfo.Lock()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// UnlockID unlock by specific identifier
|
|
func (idMutex *idMutexImpl) UnlockID(identifier any) {
|
|
shard := idMutex.shards[idMutex.getShardIndex(identifier)]
|
|
|
|
shard.Lock()
|
|
defer shard.Unlock()
|
|
mutexInfo, ok := shard.mutexInfos[identifier]
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
panic("cannot find workflow lock")
|
|
}
|
|
mutexInfo.Unlock()
|
|
if mutexInfo.waitCount == 1 {
|
|
delete(shard.mutexInfos, identifier)
|
|
} else {
|
|
mutexInfo.waitCount--
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (idMutex *idMutexImpl) getShardIndex(key any) uint32 {
|
|
return idMutex.hashFn(key) % idMutex.numShard
|
|
}
|