mirror of
https://github.com/hanzoai/team.git
synced 2026-09-30 01:57:35 +00:00
zeekay
8feb24ea1f
The server module named github.com/hanzoai/team/server/v8 — a path that resolves to the retired workspace's repository, not this one — while server/public still published github.com/mattermost/mattermost/server/public. Both are github.com/hanzoteam/server/... now, which is where this code actually lives. That second half is what made the binary unbootable. Upstream's public path stayed claimed by upstream, mattermost-plugin-ai imported it, and the build linked public/model twice; public/plugin's gob.Register then ran twice under one name and panicked at init, before main. Reverting the rename traded the brand for a working binary. Rebranding the plugin alongside it needs no such trade: the agents fork is github.com/hanzoteam/agents/v2 against our public module, so no module named mattermost/mattermost is in the graph at all. Measured: `go list -deps ./cmd/mattermost` names exactly one public/model, and it is ours.
61 lines
2.0 KiB
Go
61 lines
2.0 KiB
Go
// Copyright (c) 2015-present Mattermost, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
// See LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
|
|
package app
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/hanzoteam/server/server/public/model"
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func TestIsMembershipRule(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Run("nil rule is not a membership rule", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
assert.False(t, isMembershipRule(nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("named rule with membership action is not a membership rule", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// v0.4 permission rules always carry a Name; treat a non-empty Name as a
|
|
// permission rule even if its Actions happen to mention membership, so a
|
|
// rename can't accidentally collide with the membership slot.
|
|
rule := &model.AccessControlPolicyRule{
|
|
Name: "Custom",
|
|
Actions: []string{model.AccessControlPolicyActionMembership},
|
|
}
|
|
assert.False(t, isMembershipRule(rule))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("unnamed rule without membership action is not a membership rule", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Anonymous non-membership rules can't be safely identified across the
|
|
// submit boundary; mergeStoredPolicyExpressions deliberately skips them
|
|
// rather than mispair, so this helper must report false too.
|
|
rule := &model.AccessControlPolicyRule{
|
|
Actions: []string{model.AccessControlPolicyActionUploadFileAttachment},
|
|
}
|
|
assert.False(t, isMembershipRule(rule))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("unnamed rule with membership action is a membership rule", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
rule := &model.AccessControlPolicyRule{
|
|
Actions: []string{model.AccessControlPolicyActionMembership},
|
|
}
|
|
assert.True(t, isMembershipRule(rule))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("unnamed rule with membership action among others is a membership rule", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
rule := &model.AccessControlPolicyRule{
|
|
Actions: []string{
|
|
model.AccessControlPolicyActionUploadFileAttachment,
|
|
model.AccessControlPolicyActionMembership,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
assert.True(t, isMembershipRule(rule))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("empty actions list is not a membership rule", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
rule := &model.AccessControlPolicyRule{}
|
|
assert.False(t, isMembershipRule(rule))
|
|
})
|
|
}
|