Files
zeekay 6e02ab9e1a oss: NOTICE crediting Qdrant, on the branch that actually carries the code
hanzoai/vector is a Qdrant fork — 375 files on `master` name qdrant, the
history starts at Qdrant's own `init` commit, and Cargo.toml declares
Apache-2.0. The code was fully rebranded to `hanzo-vector` with no NOTICE,
so nothing in the distributed artifact named the upstream author.

The NOTICE text is not new. z wrote it on 2026-06-21 in 10dd93dfe
("chore: restore upstream attribution + NOTICE (OSS compliance)"), but that
commit landed on ci/canonical-docker-build-1776997064 and was never merged,
so `master` — the branch that carries the code — never got it. This carries
his wording over verbatim.

What is deliberately NOT carried over: 10dd93dfe also prepended two
copyright lines to LICENSE. Upstream Qdrant's LICENSE is the bare
Apache-2.0 text with no copyright line in it (the appendix still reads
"Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]"), so there is no upstream
notice there to retain — those lines would be an edit to an upstream
licence, not a preservation of one. Attribution belongs in NOTICE, which
is also what Apache-2.0 s4(d) asks for. LICENSE is untouched.

Note for whoever owns the default branch: `main` is a four-file stub
(README, LLM.md, CLAUDE.md, LICENSE) whose LICENSE reads "MIT License,
Copyright (c) 2026 Hanzo AI". No Apache-licensed code sits under it, so it
is not a redistribution violation today, but the default branch of a Qdrant
fork asserting MIT is misleading and should be reconciled with master.
2026-08-03 19:59:33 -07:00

7 lines
190 B
Plaintext

Vector
Copyright (c) 2020-2026 Hanzo AI, Inc.
This product includes software from Qdrant (https://github.com/qdrant/qdrant), licensed under Apache-2.0:
Copyright Qdrant Solutions GmbH