Files
Marc VertesandGitHub 0ec0297962 interp: fix a wrong control flow in switch
In switch case expressions, the condition on case clause was
not always properly evaluated. Reverse the order of case clause
evaluations (as already done for if-else-if fashion), and fix the
wiring to false-next and true-next nodes.

Fixes #1126.
2021-06-14 12:18:07 +02:00

64 lines
1.0 KiB
Go

package main
import (
"encoding/xml"
"errors"
"fmt"
)
type Email struct {
Where string `xml:"where,attr"`
Addr string
}
func f(r interface{}) error {
return withPointerAsInterface(&r)
}
func withPointerAsInterface(r interface{}) error {
_ = (r).(*interface{})
rp, ok := (r).(*interface{})
if !ok {
return errors.New("cannot assert to *interface{}")
}
em, ok := (*rp).(*Email)
if !ok {
return errors.New("cannot assert to *Email")
}
em.Where = "work"
em.Addr = "[email protected]"
return nil
}
func ff(s string, r interface{}) error {
return xml.Unmarshal([]byte(s), r)
}
func fff(s string, r interface{}) error {
return xml.Unmarshal([]byte(s), &r)
}
func main() {
data := `
<Email where='work'>
<Addr>[email protected]</Addr>
</Email>
`
v := Email{}
err := f(&v)
fmt.Println(err, v)
vv := Email{}
err = ff(data, &vv)
fmt.Println(err, vv)
vvv := Email{}
err = ff(data, &vvv)
fmt.Println(err, vvv)
}
// Output:
// <nil> {work [email protected]}
// <nil> {work [email protected]}
// <nil> {work [email protected]}