Files

3.1 KiB

Voice & Tone Checklists

Pre-Writing Checklist

  • Identified primary argument/thesis
  • Gathered supporting evidence/data
  • Considered counterarguments
  • Determined appropriate length (quick take vs. deep dive)
  • Identified target audience and their knowledge level
  • Chosen opening strategy that fits content
  • Planned evidence integration points
  • Selected 3-5 relevant hashtags (if applicable)

During Writing Checklist

Tone & Voice

  • Starting with context, ending with sharp observation
  • Using conversational language without sacrificing substance
  • Incorporating strategic humor where appropriate (not forced)
  • Asking rhetorical questions to engage readers
  • Balancing skepticism with fairness

Structure & Flow

  • Opening hooks reader immediately
  • Each section builds on previous one
  • Using em dashes, colons, and varied sentence length
  • Supporting claims with specific examples
  • Addressing complexity and nuance
  • Conclusion ties back to opening

Credibility & Accuracy

  • All major claims backed by data or sources
  • Links provided for evidence
  • Acknowledging uncertainty where appropriate
  • No strawman arguments
  • Distinguishing personal experience from industry patterns

Technical Elements (If Applicable)

  • Technical terms used accurately and explained
  • Industry jargon balanced with accessibility
  • Hashtags relevant and strategically placed
  • Links formatted and functional

Post-Writing Checklist

  • Read aloud to check rhythm and flow
  • Verify all claims and statistics
  • Check for logical consistency
  • Ensure opening matches conclusion
  • Review for unnecessary repetition
  • Confirm tone matches intended voice
  • Test all links and references
  • Proofread for typos and grammar
  • Verify hashtags are appropriate
  • Consider if anything needs source citation

Tone Adjustment Guide

If Your Draft Feels Too Dry

  • Add more direct address to reader ("Here's what you're missing...")
  • Include rhetorical questions
  • Use more em dashes for emphasis
  • Inject specific examples with personality
  • Consider self-deprecating observation ("I'm no financial expert, but...")

If Your Draft Feels Too Casual

  • Increase specific evidence and data citations
  • Develop technical explanations more thoroughly
  • Use fewer colloquialisms
  • Add more analytical frameworks
  • Balance humor with substantive argumentation

If Your Draft Feels Uncertain

  • Clarify your actual position vs. presenting options
  • Use stronger evidence or remove unsupported claims
  • Acknowledge gaps explicitly rather than hedging
  • Differentiate between "I don't know" and "data shows"
  • Restructure to lead with strongest arguments

If Your Draft Feels Aggressive

  • Acknowledge legitimate strengths of criticized entity
  • Present strongest version of opposing argument
  • Soften language while keeping edge ("questionable" vs. "terrible")
  • Add nuance sections
  • Include "I might be wrong about this" where appropriate

Use these checklists before, during, and after writing to maintain consistency with the critical article style.