mirror of
https://github.com/lux-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-11-03 05:07:46 +00:00
zeekay
dd93cb41f7
Sweep across the non-Tier-1 paper catalogue (Tier-1 owned by parallel
agent and excluded). All 113 processed papers already had luxcover
wired up; this commit fixes 14 build breakers and produces fresh
PDFs across the catalogue.
Fixes:
- lux-blockchain-scaling-laws: em-dash inside lstlisting -> --
- lux-corona-pq: stale \input pointing at 03-the-corona-scheme renamed
to 03-the-corona-scheme (file already renamed on disk)
- lux-lattice-cryptography-primer: same Corona->Corona rename
- lux-formal-verification-lean4: Lean source uses unicode (×, ∀, ∃, ∈,
∧, ∨, ∩, ≠, ⟨, ⟩, ·, ¬) inside lstlistings. Added a literate map
so listings render the math glyphs without UTF-8 fault.
- lux-id-did-specification: ✓/✗ in tabular replaced with \ding{51}
/ \ding{55} (pifont). Added pifont package.
- lux-ntt-simd-implementation: middle-dot in Go assembly listings;
added literate {·}{\textperiodcentered}.
- lux-ntt-transform: μ, ×, –, — in regular text (no T1 fontenc).
Replaced with $\mu$/$\times$/--/--- via unicode->latex sweep.
- lux-perpetuals-derivatives, lux-quantum-consensus,
lux-quasar-consensus, lux-tee-computing-mesh: same unicode->latex
sweep across body text. Also fixed broken math segment
`$L_{avg} = 10$\times$$` -> `$L_{avg} = 10\times$`.
- lux-zchain: emoji glyphs in roadmap table replaced with
parenthetical text.
- lux-triple-proof-consensus: dropped duplicate \usepackage{geometry}
that clashed with luxcover (geometry option clash).
- pq: defined missing \Rq macro.
PDFs rebuilt for the full Tier-2/3 set.
Excluded (Tier-1, parallel agent): lp-073-pulsar, lp-stricte2epq,
dag-evm-formal, lp-010-quasar-stm-{3,4}, lp-020-quasar-consensus,
lux-institutional-custody, lux-nist-mptc-submission, pqsafe-il5,
pq-rns, plus shared/ and lps/.
65 lines
2.6 KiB
TeX
65 lines
2.6 KiB
TeX
\documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}
|
|
\usepackage{../shared/luxcover}
|
|
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
|
|
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts}
|
|
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
|
\usepackage{hyperref}
|
|
\usepackage{algorithm}
|
|
\usepackage{algpseudocode}
|
|
\usepackage{listings}
|
|
\input{../shared/lstlang}
|
|
\usepackage{xcolor}
|
|
\usepackage{booktabs}
|
|
|
|
% Code listings setup
|
|
\lstset{
|
|
language=Solidity,
|
|
basicstyle=\small\ttfamily,
|
|
keywordstyle=\color{blue}\bfseries,
|
|
commentstyle=\color{gray},
|
|
stringstyle=\color{red},
|
|
breaklines=true,
|
|
frame=single,
|
|
numbers=left,
|
|
numberstyle=\tiny\color{gray},
|
|
captionpos=b
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
\title{Lux Governance: Unified DAO Framework for Multi-Ecosystem Coordination}
|
|
|
|
\author{
|
|
Zach Kelling\thanks{Corresponding author: [email protected]}\\
|
|
\textit{Lux Partners Limited Limited}\\
|
|
\texttt{[email protected]}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
\date{2023}
|
|
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
|
|
\luxcoverpage
|
|
\begin{abstract}
|
|
We present Lux Governance, a unified decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) framework designed to coordinate protocol evolution across three interconnected ecosystems: Lux (blockchain infrastructure), Zoo (DeFi and NFT marketplace), and Hanzo (AI infrastructure). The system implements on-chain voting through smart contracts, combines token-weighted governance with validator participation, and introduces holographic consensus for scalable decision-making. Through the Lux Proposal (LP) standardization process, cross-chain voting mechanisms, and quantum-secure signature aggregation, the framework enables 10,000+ active governance participants to coordinate protocol upgrades, economic parameters, and treasury management while maintaining security and decentralization. This paper details the DAO architecture, voting mechanisms, LP lifecycle, cross-ecosystem coordination protocols, and incentive structures that have successfully governed \$2.8B in total value locked across all three networks.
|
|
\end{abstract}
|
|
|
|
\input{sections/01-introduction}
|
|
\input{sections/02-dao-architecture}
|
|
\input{sections/03-holographic-consensus}
|
|
\input{sections/04-lp-lux-proposal-standardization-process}
|
|
\input{sections/05-on-chain-voting-implementation}
|
|
\input{sections/06-cross-ecosystem-coordination}
|
|
\input{sections/07-validator-participation}
|
|
\input{sections/08-incentive-structures}
|
|
\input{sections/09-security-and-attack-prevention}
|
|
\input{sections/10-dao-treasury-management}
|
|
\input{sections/11-historical-performance}
|
|
\input{sections/12-tools-and-infrastructure}
|
|
\input{sections/13-comparison-with-other-daos}
|
|
\input{sections/14-future-enhancements}
|
|
\input{sections/15-conclusion}
|
|
\input{sections/17-acknowledgments}
|
|
\input{sections/18-appendix-a-lp-template}
|
|
\input{sections/99-references}
|
|
|
|
\end{document}
|