mirror of
https://github.com/lux-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-11-03 05:07:46 +00:00
zeekay
dd93cb41f7
Sweep across the non-Tier-1 paper catalogue (Tier-1 owned by parallel
agent and excluded). All 113 processed papers already had luxcover
wired up; this commit fixes 14 build breakers and produces fresh
PDFs across the catalogue.
Fixes:
- lux-blockchain-scaling-laws: em-dash inside lstlisting -> --
- lux-corona-pq: stale \input pointing at 03-the-corona-scheme renamed
to 03-the-corona-scheme (file already renamed on disk)
- lux-lattice-cryptography-primer: same Corona->Corona rename
- lux-formal-verification-lean4: Lean source uses unicode (×, ∀, ∃, ∈,
∧, ∨, ∩, ≠, ⟨, ⟩, ·, ¬) inside lstlistings. Added a literate map
so listings render the math glyphs without UTF-8 fault.
- lux-id-did-specification: ✓/✗ in tabular replaced with \ding{51}
/ \ding{55} (pifont). Added pifont package.
- lux-ntt-simd-implementation: middle-dot in Go assembly listings;
added literate {·}{\textperiodcentered}.
- lux-ntt-transform: μ, ×, –, — in regular text (no T1 fontenc).
Replaced with $\mu$/$\times$/--/--- via unicode->latex sweep.
- lux-perpetuals-derivatives, lux-quantum-consensus,
lux-quasar-consensus, lux-tee-computing-mesh: same unicode->latex
sweep across body text. Also fixed broken math segment
`$L_{avg} = 10$\times$$` -> `$L_{avg} = 10\times$`.
- lux-zchain: emoji glyphs in roadmap table replaced with
parenthetical text.
- lux-triple-proof-consensus: dropped duplicate \usepackage{geometry}
that clashed with luxcover (geometry option clash).
- pq: defined missing \Rq macro.
PDFs rebuilt for the full Tier-2/3 set.
Excluded (Tier-1, parallel agent): lp-073-pulsar, lp-stricte2epq,
dag-evm-formal, lp-010-quasar-stm-{3,4}, lp-020-quasar-consensus,
lux-institutional-custody, lux-nist-mptc-submission, pqsafe-il5,
pq-rns, plus shared/ and lps/.
109 lines
3.4 KiB
TeX
109 lines
3.4 KiB
TeX
\section{DAO Architecture}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Three-Tier Governance Structure}
|
||
|
||
\begin{figure}[h]
|
||
\centering
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
+---------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| Cross-Ecosystem Coordination |
|
||
| (Multi-chain proposals affecting all ecosystems) |
|
||
+--------------+--------------+--------------+------------+
|
||
| | |
|
||
+----------v-----+ +----v-----+ +----v----------+
|
||
| Lux DAO | | Zoo DAO | | Hanzo DAO |
|
||
| | | | | |
|
||
| * Consensus | | * DeFi | | * AI Models |
|
||
| * Bridge | | * NFTs | | * Compute |
|
||
| * Appchains | | * Gaming | | * Inference |
|
||
+----------------+ +----------+ +---------------+
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
\caption{Three-tier DAO architecture}
|
||
\end{figure}
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Lux DAO}
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Primary Focus}: Blockchain protocol governance
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Token}: LUX (native token)
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Governance Scope}:
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item Consensus mechanism upgrades (Wave, Focus, Quasar)
|
||
\item Network economic parameters (block rewards, fees, staking)
|
||
\item Bridge security and validator sets
|
||
\item Appchain creation and management
|
||
\item Treasury allocation and grants
|
||
\item LP standardization process
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Voting Power Calculation}:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
VP_{Lux} = \text{Stake}_{LUX} \times (1 + \text{Reputation}) \times \text{Delegation Factor}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
|
||
Where:
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item $\text{Stake}_{LUX}$: Amount of LUX staked in governance contract
|
||
\item $\text{Reputation}$: 0-0.5× multiplier based on participation history
|
||
\item $\text{Delegation Factor}$: 1.0 for self-voting, 0.8 for delegated votes
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Zoo DAO}
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Primary Focus}: DeFi and NFT marketplace governance
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Token}: ZOO (BSC-based BEP-20 token)
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Governance Scope}:
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item NFT marketplace fees and policies
|
||
\item DeFi protocol parameters (AMM, lending, staking)
|
||
\item Gaming integration and metaverse features
|
||
\item DAO treasury investments
|
||
\item Partnership proposals
|
||
\item Brand and marketing decisions
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Voting Power Calculation}:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
VP_{Zoo} = \text{Stake}_{ZOO} + \text{NFT}_{holdings} \times 0.3 + \text{LP}_{tokens} \times 0.5
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
|
||
Where:
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item $\text{Stake}_{ZOO}$: ZOO tokens locked in governance
|
||
\item $\text{NFT}_{holdings}$: Value of Zoo NFTs held (normalized)
|
||
\item $\text{LP}_{tokens}$: Liquidity provider tokens in Zoo pools
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Hanzo DAO}
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Primary Focus}: AI infrastructure governance
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Token}: HANZO (AI compute credits convertible to governance power)
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Governance Scope}:
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item AI model registry and verification
|
||
\item Compute marketplace pricing and policies
|
||
\item TEE attestation standards (A-Chain)
|
||
\item Jin architecture upgrades
|
||
\item MCP (Model Context Protocol) extensions
|
||
\item AI safety and ethical AI guidelines
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Voting Power Calculation}:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
VP_{Hanzo} = \text{Stake}_{HANZO} + \text{Compute}_{provided} \times 0.4 + \text{Model}_{quality} \times 0.2
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
|
||
Where:
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item $\text{Stake}_{HANZO}$: HANZO tokens staked
|
||
\item $\text{Compute}_{provided}$: TEE compute contributed (normalized)
|
||
\item $\text{Model}_{quality}$: Quality score of AI models published
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|