mirror of
https://github.com/lux-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-11-03 05:07:46 +00:00
zeekay
4a753bb639
Restructured from flat .tex/.pdf files into per-paper subdirectories. Added Antje Worring as co-author on all papers. Synced PDFs to pdfs/ for download site.
57 lines
1.9 KiB
TeX
57 lines
1.9 KiB
TeX
\section{Holographic Consensus}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Scalable Governance Mechanism}
|
||
|
||
Traditional DAOs require all token holders to review every proposal, leading to:
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item \textbf{Voter fatigue}: Overwhelmed by proposal volume
|
||
\item \textbf{Low participation}: <5\% typical voting rates
|
||
\item \textbf{Gridlock}: Important proposals blocked by apathy
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Holographic consensus} solves this through \emph{prediction markets} that filter proposals:
|
||
|
||
\begin{algorithm}[H]
|
||
\caption{Holographic Consensus Filtering}
|
||
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
|
||
\Function{FilterProposal}{$proposal, predictionMarket$}
|
||
\State $stake \gets$ InitializePredictionMarket($proposal$)
|
||
\State $supporters \gets$ StakeFor($proposal$)
|
||
\State $opponents \gets$ StakeAgainst($proposal$)
|
||
|
||
\If{$supporters > threshold$}
|
||
\State \textbf{return} \texttt{BOOSTED} \Comment{Fast-track to full DAO vote}
|
||
\ElsIf{$opponents > threshold$}
|
||
\State \textbf{return} \texttt{REJECTED} \Comment{Filtered out early}
|
||
\Else
|
||
\State \textbf{return} \texttt{REGULAR} \Comment{Normal governance queue}
|
||
\EndIf
|
||
\EndFunction
|
||
\end{algorithmic}
|
||
\end{algorithm}
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Prediction Market Mechanics}
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Staking for Prediction}:
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item Supporters stake tokens predicting proposal will pass
|
||
\item Opponents stake predicting proposal will fail
|
||
\item Winner receives staked tokens from losing side (minus 2\% protocol fee)
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Incentive Alignment}:
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item High-quality proposals attract supporter stakes (boosted)
|
||
\item Low-quality proposals attract opponent stakes (filtered)
|
||
\item Reduces voter fatigue by pre-filtering proposals
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Results}:
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item 87\% of boosted proposals ultimately pass full DAO vote
|
||
\item 91\% of filtered proposals would have failed DAO vote (validated post-hoc)
|
||
\item 3× improvement in voter participation for boosted proposals
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|