Files
papers/lux-institutional-custody/sections/99-conclusion.tex
zeekay ced35b03ed papers: Mar-3 freeze deliverables for hybrid PQ consensus stack
Quasar Horizon (consensus composition over Pulsar / ML-DSA / BLS lanes
under Prism + LSS lifecycle), Warp 2.0 (Pulse-backed cross-chain envelope
with forward-only v1->v2 migration and lattigo ReadUint64Slice DoS fix),
benchmark report (microbench, reshare, activation, Warp 2.0 verify, Prism
composition, GPU headroom, cross-WAN latency), and NIST IR 8214C-style
submission package (spec, parameter sets, domain separation, serialization,
reference-impl pointers, evaluation report, security analysis, side-channel
considerations).

All four deliverables compile cleanly via pdflatex+bibtex and reference
the canonical proof bucket files at proofs/{definitions,pulsar,lss,quasar}.
No duplication of proof bodies; cite by file path.
2026-03-03 12:00:00 -08:00

60 lines
2.8 KiB
TeX

\section{Conclusion}
\label{sec:conclusion}
%% =====================================================================
The architecture specified in this paper is a complete, auditable,
and operationally tractable custody design for an institutional
digital-asset fund at the eight-billion-dollar tier. Its load-bearing
properties are:
\begin{enumerate}[nosep]
\item \textbf{No single point of authority.} No custodian, cloud,
jurisdiction, vendor, or operator can move the fund's assets alone.
The minimum collusion required is three independent parties at the
cold tier, two at the warm tier, and two with a 24-hour delay at
the hot tier.
\item \textbf{No on-chain custody footprint.} Threshold MPC over
secp256k1 produces a single canonical signature on every chain; the
custody policy is invisible to the chain.
\item \textbf{Vendor and jurisdiction diversity.} Five HSM
share-holders span four vendor lines (Thales, Utimaco, Marvell,
Yubico) and at least three jurisdictions on the cold tier; warm tier
spans three jurisdictions.
\item \textbf{Post-quantum hedge.} Lux Triple Consensus
(LP-020 \cite{lp020}) on the M-Chain custody ledger
(LP-006 \cite{lp006}) provides forward security against future
quantum break of secp256k1.
\item \textbf{Compliance-ready.} The architecture maps directly to
SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, CCSS Level 3, FIPS 140-2 Level 3,
MiCA, MAS PSN02, and US OCC trust-charter or NYDFS BitLicense
fiduciary controls.
\item \textbf{Operationally cheap.} Steady-state cost is
approximately 6.7 bps of AUM, comfortably below the 5--12 bps
typical of incumbent custodians and competitive even against the
low end of that band.
\end{enumerate}
The migration from any of the four leading incumbents (BitGo,
Fireblocks, Anchorage Digital, Coinbase Custody) is a 90-day
operation; the architecture can be in steady-state operation by
day 90 and fully audit-attested by day 180.
We emphasise that the design contains no novel cryptography. Every
component -- CGGMP21 threshold ECDSA, Feldman VSS distributed
key generation, Shamir secret sharing, vendor-attested HSM-resident
keys, BLS+ML-DSA hybrid audit log -- is published, peer-reviewed,
and deployed in production at multiple institutions. The
contribution of this paper is the integration: the specification
that places each component on the path that does the most work, and
the operational policy that ensures the integration's properties
hold under realistic adversaries and realistic ops teams.
The architecture is implemented end-to-end in the
\texttt{luxfi/mpc} and \texttt{luxfi/hsm} reference codebases.
Reference deployment manifests, ceremony run-books, SOC 2 control
narratives, and CCSS evidence packages are available to
implementors under the licence terms of those repositories.
%% =====================================================================