mirror of
https://github.com/lux-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-10-30 18:15:21 +00:00
zeekay
dd93cb41f7
Sweep across the non-Tier-1 paper catalogue (Tier-1 owned by parallel
agent and excluded). All 113 processed papers already had luxcover
wired up; this commit fixes 14 build breakers and produces fresh
PDFs across the catalogue.
Fixes:
- lux-blockchain-scaling-laws: em-dash inside lstlisting -> --
- lux-corona-pq: stale \input pointing at 03-the-corona-scheme renamed
to 03-the-corona-scheme (file already renamed on disk)
- lux-lattice-cryptography-primer: same Corona->Corona rename
- lux-formal-verification-lean4: Lean source uses unicode (×, ∀, ∃, ∈,
∧, ∨, ∩, ≠, ⟨, ⟩, ·, ¬) inside lstlistings. Added a literate map
so listings render the math glyphs without UTF-8 fault.
- lux-id-did-specification: ✓/✗ in tabular replaced with \ding{51}
/ \ding{55} (pifont). Added pifont package.
- lux-ntt-simd-implementation: middle-dot in Go assembly listings;
added literate {·}{\textperiodcentered}.
- lux-ntt-transform: μ, ×, –, — in regular text (no T1 fontenc).
Replaced with $\mu$/$\times$/--/--- via unicode->latex sweep.
- lux-perpetuals-derivatives, lux-quantum-consensus,
lux-quasar-consensus, lux-tee-computing-mesh: same unicode->latex
sweep across body text. Also fixed broken math segment
`$L_{avg} = 10$\times$$` -> `$L_{avg} = 10\times$`.
- lux-zchain: emoji glyphs in roadmap table replaced with
parenthetical text.
- lux-triple-proof-consensus: dropped duplicate \usepackage{geometry}
that clashed with luxcover (geometry option clash).
- pq: defined missing \Rq macro.
PDFs rebuilt for the full Tier-2/3 set.
Excluded (Tier-1, parallel agent): lp-073-pulsar, lp-stricte2epq,
dag-evm-formal, lp-010-quasar-stm-{3,4}, lp-020-quasar-consensus,
lux-institutional-custody, lux-nist-mptc-submission, pqsafe-il5,
pq-rns, plus shared/ and lps/.
66 lines
2.8 KiB
TeX
66 lines
2.8 KiB
TeX
\documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}
|
|
\usepackage{../shared/luxcover}
|
|
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
|
|
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
|
|
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts,amsthm}
|
|
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
|
\usepackage{hyperref}
|
|
\usepackage{algorithm}
|
|
\usepackage{algpseudocode}
|
|
\usepackage{booktabs}
|
|
\usepackage{multirow}
|
|
\usepackage{array}
|
|
\usepackage{xcolor}
|
|
\usepackage{pgfplots}
|
|
\usepackage{float}
|
|
\usepackage{enumitem}
|
|
\usepackage{mathtools}
|
|
\pgfplotsset{compat=1.18}
|
|
|
|
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
|
|
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
|
|
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
|
|
\newtheorem{definition}{Definition}
|
|
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
|
|
\newtheorem{remark}{Remark}
|
|
|
|
\hypersetup{
|
|
colorlinks=true,
|
|
linkcolor=blue,
|
|
citecolor=blue,
|
|
urlcolor=blue
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
\title{\textbf{Lux Tokenomics: Economic Design for Multi-Chain Consensus Networks}\\[6pt]
|
|
\large Token Distribution, Staking Economics, Fee Burning, and\\Inflation--Deflation Mechanics for Sustainable Network Growth}
|
|
|
|
\author{
|
|
Zach Kelling\thanks{Corresponding author: [email protected]}\\
|
|
\textit{Lux Partners Limited Limited}\\
|
|
\texttt{[email protected]}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
\date{2023}
|
|
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
|
|
\luxcoverpage
|
|
|
|
\begin{abstract}
|
|
We present the complete tokenomic framework for Lux Network, a multi-consensus blockchain platform supporting heterogeneous appchains with independent virtual machines. The Lux token (LUX) serves simultaneously as the staking asset for Proof-of-Stake consensus, the gas token for transaction fees on the primary network, and the economic coordination mechanism across sovereign appchains. This paper formalizes the token supply schedule, derives optimal staking reward functions under rational validator assumptions, introduces an adaptive fee-burning mechanism that targets long-run deflation proportional to network utilization, and analyzes the game-theoretic equilibrium of validator participation. We prove that the proposed reward function satisfies incentive compatibility under a Byzantine adversary controlling up to one-third of stake, and we show via simulation that the fee-burning mechanism converges to a stable equilibrium supply within 200 epochs under realistic transaction volume growth. Finally, we compare the Lux tokenomic model against Ethereum EIP-1559, Cosmos ATOM inflation, and Polkadot DOT mechanics, demonstrating superior capital efficiency and lower variance in validator returns.
|
|
\end{abstract}
|
|
|
|
\input{sections/01-introduction}
|
|
\input{sections/02-token-supply-model}
|
|
\input{sections/03-staking-reward-mechanism}
|
|
\input{sections/04-adaptive-fee-burning-protocol}
|
|
\input{sections/05-game-theoretic-analysis}
|
|
\input{sections/06-appchain-economic-coupling}
|
|
\input{sections/07-simulation-results}
|
|
\input{sections/08-comparison-with-existing-systems}
|
|
\input{sections/09-inflation-schedule-details}
|
|
\input{sections/10-related-work}
|
|
\input{sections/99-conclusion}
|
|
|
|
\end{document}
|