Files
papers/lux-validator-economics/sections/11-comparison-with-other-pos-systems.tex
zeekay 4a753bb639 papers: reorganize into per-paper dirs, add Antje Worring as co-author
Restructured from flat .tex/.pdf files into per-paper subdirectories.
Added Antje Worring as co-author on all papers.
Synced PDFs to pdfs/ for download site.
2026-04-18 21:50:07 -07:00

22 lines
780 B
TeX

\section{Comparison with Other PoS Systems}
\label{sec:comparison}
\begin{table}[H]
\centering
\caption{Validator economics comparison across PoS platforms.}
\label{tab:comparison}
\begin{tabular}{p{2.8cm}p{2.2cm}p{2.2cm}p{2.2cm}p{2.2cm}}
\toprule
\textbf{Feature} & \textbf{Lux} & \textbf{Ethereum} & \textbf{Cosmos} & \textbf{Polkadot} \\
\midrule
Min self-stake & 2,000 LUX & 32 ETH & Variable & Variable \\
Delegation cap & 15x self-stake & None (pooled) & None & Nominated \\
Commission range & 5--25\% & Pool-defined & 0--100\% & 0--100\% \\
Unbonding period & 14 days & Variable & 21 days & 28 days \\
Slashing (equivoc.) & 5\% & $\geq$1 ETH & 5\% & 100\% (para) \\
Appchain validation & Yes & No & ICS optional & Parachain fixed \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}