mirror of
https://github.com/lux-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-10-30 18:15:21 +00:00
Bylines, paper authorship, correspondence addresses and the founder blurb under each post named an individual. They name the organisation that published the work instead: the brand on posts and pages, the research byline on papers, and research@ in place of a personal address. Both are what these repositories already used elsewhere — nothing new was coined. Co-authors are untouched. Where a paper named someone else alongside, they stay named; only the one byline changed. Bibliography entries, running heads, PDF metadata and affiliations move with it, so a citation still resolves to whoever the cited paper names. Sample and fixture data uses the placeholder name these tests already use elsewhere, so no assertion changed meaning.
76 lines
2.7 KiB
TeX
76 lines
2.7 KiB
TeX
\documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}
|
|
\usepackage{../shared/luxcover}
|
|
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
|
|
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
|
|
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts,amsthm}
|
|
\usepackage{hyperref}
|
|
\usepackage{booktabs}
|
|
\usepackage{enumitem}
|
|
\usepackage{algorithm}
|
|
\usepackage{algpseudocode}
|
|
\usepackage{xcolor}
|
|
\usepackage{tikz}
|
|
\usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta,positioning,shapes.geometric,fit}
|
|
|
|
\hypersetup{colorlinks=true,linkcolor=black,citecolor=blue,urlcolor=blue}
|
|
|
|
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
|
|
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
|
|
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
|
|
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
|
|
\newtheorem{definition}{Definition}[section]
|
|
\newtheorem{remark}{Remark}[section]
|
|
|
|
\title{Chain-First Architecture:\\Blockchain as Source of Truth for\\Regulated Financial Infrastructure}
|
|
|
|
\author{
|
|
Lux Research\thanks{Corresponding author: [email protected]}\\
|
|
\textit{Lux Industries, Inc.}\\
|
|
\texttt{[email protected]}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
\date{2024}
|
|
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
|
|
\luxcoverpage
|
|
|
|
\begin{abstract}
|
|
We describe a ``chain-first'' architecture for regulated financial
|
|
infrastructure in which the blockchain is the authoritative source of
|
|
truth for all asset ownership and transfer records, while traditional
|
|
databases serve only as read caches that are always re-derivable from
|
|
on-chain state. This inverts the conventional pattern in which a
|
|
centralized database is authoritative and the blockchain is an
|
|
afterthought settlement layer. We formalize the architecture as a
|
|
state machine with two components: (1)~an append-only chain that
|
|
records every state transition via digitally signed transactions, and
|
|
(2)~a local cache (SQLite in development, PostgreSQL in production)
|
|
that materializes the current state by replaying chain events through
|
|
a deterministic indexer. We prove three correctness properties:
|
|
\emph{cache consistency} (the cache always reflects the chain state),
|
|
\emph{crash recovery} (the cache can be fully reconstructed from the
|
|
chain), and \emph{chain independence} (the API layer continues to
|
|
serve reads from the cache when the chain is temporarily unavailable,
|
|
and queues writes for later settlement). The architecture is deployed
|
|
on a regulated EVM L1 for an ATS handling
|
|
12,784 security tokens, with benchmarks showing 2ms read latency from
|
|
cache versus 150ms from chain RPC.
|
|
\end{abstract}
|
|
|
|
\tableofcontents
|
|
\newpage
|
|
|
|
%% =====================================================================
|
|
|
|
\input{sections/01-introduction}
|
|
\input{sections/02-formal-model}
|
|
\input{sections/03-correctness-properties}
|
|
\input{sections/04-worm-audit-trail}
|
|
\input{sections/05-architecture-details}
|
|
\input{sections/06-resilience-analysis}
|
|
\input{sections/07-formal-verification}
|
|
\input{sections/99-conclusion}
|
|
|
|
\end{document}
|