Files
zeekayandHanzo Dev 178febad68 papers: reconcile T-Chain -> M-Chain / F-Chain / B-Chain per LP-134
Every rendered "T-Chain" / "ThresholdVM" / "teleportvm" reference across
the paper corpus is rewritten to the correct canonical chain by concern:
threshold signing / MPC / bridge custody / key recovery -> M-Chain (MVM);
FHE / encrypted compute / threshold decryption -> F-Chain (FVM); teleport
/ cross-chain messaging -> B-Chain (bridgevm); consensus Pulsar stays
Q-Chain. Section lux-trust-kernel/03-t-chain-threshold-governance.tex
renamed -> 03-f-chain-encrypted-policy.tex (with \input + xref fixes).
Braided "T-Chain" sections split by concern (M vs F). Only lp-020's
chain-separation rationale and the shared lux/chains/thresholdvm library
path retain the name, to record the removal. All changed papers rebuilt
(pdflatex, rc=0, no undefined refs).

ยง09 of lux-dao-governance-framework reframed: fabricated "production
deployment" metrics ($50M/$240k/$12M, survey %s, "as of Oct 2024")
relabeled as illustrative design configurations with no invented
replacements; reality noted (DAO treasury is a 1/1 Safe); conclusion
echo + one "first production" overclaim softened.

This commit also captures concurrent corpus workstreams on the same tree.

Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
2026-07-02 00:57:09 -07:00

52 lines
2.1 KiB
TeX

\section{Introduction}
\subsection{Background}
Shor's algorithm~\cite{shor1999} renders RSA, ECDSA, and all
discrete-logarithm-based signature schemes insecure on a sufficiently
powerful quantum computer. NIST's Post-Quantum Cryptography
standardization process~\cite{nist-pqc} selected ML-KEM,
ML-DSA, and SLH-DSA (FIPS 205, formerly SPHINCS+) as the primary
replacements. Lux Network adopted these standards at the consensus
layer and extended them with threshold post-quantum signatures (Pulsar) and
fully homomorphic encryption (TFHE) for computation over ciphertexts.
\subsection{Scope}
This paper covers five layers of Lux's post-quantum stack:
\begin{enumerate}[nosep]
\item \textbf{Consensus signatures}: BLS-381 + ML-DSA-65 + Pulsar
(Quasar protocol, LP-020).
\item \textbf{Threshold key management}: TFHE key generation via
Shamir LSSS over a 2048-bit safe prime, with Feldman VSS
commitments.
\item \textbf{Fully homomorphic encryption}: TFHE boolean-gate
circuits for encrypted CRDT merge, encrypted search, and
private smart contracts.
\item \textbf{Non-custodial wallets}: 2-of-3 MPC (CGGMP21 for
secp256k1, FROST for Ed25519) with HSM co-signing.
\item \textbf{Regulatory disclosure}: viewing keys, threshold
disclosure, and ZK attestation anchoring.
\end{enumerate}
\subsection{Evolution from the 2022 Design}
The 2022 internal document proposed Lamport one-time signatures for
vault protection and an OTP-based information-theoretic signing layer.
Both were superseded:
\begin{itemize}[nosep]
\item Lamport signatures $\rightarrow$ ML-DSA-65 (FIPS~204): multi-use,
smaller signatures (3.3\,KB vs 16\,KB per Lamport instance),
NIST-standardized.
\item Network-layer OTP signing $\rightarrow$ dropped. The throughput
cost of per-transaction OTP generation was incompatible with
sub-second finality. ML-DSA provides computational (not
information-theoretic) PQ security, which is sufficient given
current lattice-hardness estimates~\cite{nist-pqc-report}.
\end{itemize}
%% ============================================================