Files
zeekay abf99d05fc papers: reorganize into per-paper dirs, add Antje Worring as co-author
Restructured from flat .tex/.pdf files into per-paper subdirectories.
Added Antje Worring as co-author on all papers.
Synced PDFs to pdfs/ for download site.
2026-04-18 21:50:07 -07:00

40 lines
1.5 KiB
TeX

\section{Introduction}
\subsection{Background}
Classical consensus protocols---PBFT, Tendermint, HotStuff,
Avalanche---operate entirely within the computational model of
classical Turing machines. Their security guarantees (BFT tolerance
of $f < n/3$, liveness under partial synchrony) are well understood.
However, as quantum computing hardware approaches fault-tolerant
scale, two questions arise:
\begin{enumerate}[nosep]
\item Can quantum computational primitives \emph{improve} consensus
performance (latency, throughput, or fault tolerance)?
\item Can a consensus protocol be designed such that its difficulty
adjustment is itself a quantum computation, enabling the network
to exploit quantum resources when available?
\end{enumerate}
The Quantum Consensus Protocol addresses both questions by using
Eisenstein series---objects from analytic number theory with natural
lattice structure---as the computational kernel of the consensus
mechanism.
\subsection{Goals}
\begin{itemize}[nosep]
\item A consensus protocol whose verification is classically efficient
but whose optimal \emph{proposal} computation benefits from
quantum speedup.
\item Difficulty adjustment via amplitude amplification (Grover's
algorithm~\cite{grover1996}), providing quadratic speedup for
parameter search.
\item Convergence guarantees derived from the analytic properties of
Eisenstein series.
\end{itemize}
%% ============================================================