mirror of
https://github.com/lux-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-10-30 18:15:21 +00:00
zeekay
1ecc25e9cf
The seven engine specifications (lux-{photon,wave,nova,nebula,prism,ray,field}-protocol)
were fragmented short notes documenting layers of the same Quasar consensus stack.
This commit merges them into a single canonical reference, lux-consensus-engines.tex,
that uses one preamble, one set of theorems, one bibliography, and one composition
chapter showing how the engines layer into the LP-020 finality pipeline.
The seven originals are reduced to single-page breadcrumb stubs pointing at the
consolidated paper; their sections/ content is preserved on disk for git history.
- new: lux-consensus-engines/ (50 pages, 646KB PDF, ~2900 lines tex)
- breadcrumbs: each original keeps cover + title + stub paragraph naming its chapter
- composition: chapter 9 records the layered contract Photon < Wave < Nova < ...
- bibliography: consolidated from the seven original thebibliography blocks
38 lines
1.2 KiB
TeX
38 lines
1.2 KiB
TeX
\section{Empirical Evaluation}
|
|
|
|
\label{sec:prism-evaluation}
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Scaling Experiments}
|
|
|
|
\begin{table}[h]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\begin{tabular}{@{}rrrr@{}}
|
|
\toprule
|
|
\textbf{Bands $B$} & \textbf{TPS} & \textbf{Scaling Efficiency} & \textbf{Latency (median)} \\
|
|
\midrule
|
|
1 & 4,200 & 100\% & 500ms \\
|
|
2 & 8,100 & 96\% & 500ms \\
|
|
4 & 15,800 & 94\% & 520ms \\
|
|
8 & 30,500 & 91\% & 540ms \\
|
|
16 & 50,400 & 75\% & 580ms \\
|
|
32 & 78,000 & 58\% & 650ms \\
|
|
\bottomrule
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
\caption{Prism throughput scaling with spectrum bands on 1,000-node testnet}
|
|
\label{tab:prism-scaling}
|
|
\end{table}
|
|
|
|
Prism achieved near-linear scaling up to 8 bands, with 50,400 TPS at 16 bands (75\%
|
|
efficiency). The efficiency drop at higher band counts is due to increased message size
|
|
(each query carries preferences for all bands) and combiner synchronization overhead.
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Direct Voting Impact}
|
|
|
|
With direct voting enabled, 85\% of transactions (those with no conflict) finalized
|
|
in a single round (50ms), dramatically reducing average latency to 120ms while
|
|
maintaining the same throughput.
|
|
|
|
%% -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
%% 8. CONCLUSION
|
|
%% -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|