Files
papers/lux-credit-lending/sections/12-comparison-with-competitors.tex
zeekayandHanzo Dev 178febad68 papers: reconcile T-Chain -> M-Chain / F-Chain / B-Chain per LP-134
Every rendered "T-Chain" / "ThresholdVM" / "teleportvm" reference across
the paper corpus is rewritten to the correct canonical chain by concern:
threshold signing / MPC / bridge custody / key recovery -> M-Chain (MVM);
FHE / encrypted compute / threshold decryption -> F-Chain (FVM); teleport
/ cross-chain messaging -> B-Chain (bridgevm); consensus Pulsar stays
Q-Chain. Section lux-trust-kernel/03-t-chain-threshold-governance.tex
renamed -> 03-f-chain-encrypted-policy.tex (with \input + xref fixes).
Braided "T-Chain" sections split by concern (M vs F). Only lp-020's
chain-separation rationale and the shared lux/chains/thresholdvm library
path retain the name, to record the removal. All changed papers rebuilt
(pdflatex, rc=0, no undefined refs).

ยง09 of lux-dao-governance-framework reframed: fabricated "production
deployment" metrics ($50M/$240k/$12M, survey %s, "as of Oct 2024")
relabeled as illustrative design configurations with no invented
replacements; reality noted (DAO treasury is a 1/1 Safe); conclusion
echo + one "first production" overclaim softened.

This commit also captures concurrent corpus workstreams on the same tree.

Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
2026-07-02 00:57:09 -07:00

19 lines
551 B
TeX

\section{Comparison with Competitors}
\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\small
\begin{tabular}{@{}lrrrr@{}}
\toprule
\textbf{Protocol} & \textbf{Max LTV} & \textbf{APY} & \textbf{BTC Support} & \textbf{Liquidations} \\ \midrule
Lux Credit & 90\% & 11.0\% & Yes (MPC) & 0 \\
Alchemix & 50\% & 8.5\% & No & Rare \\
MakerDAO & 66\% & 1.0\% & Via wBTC & Common \\
Aave & 75\% & 2.8\% & Via wBTC & Common \\
Compound & 70\% & 3.2\% & Via wBTC & Common \\ \bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\caption{Competitive comparison (Lux figures are design targets)}
\end{table}