mirror of
https://github.com/lux-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-10-30 18:15:21 +00:00
zeekay
abf99d05fc
Restructured from flat .tex/.pdf files into per-paper subdirectories. Added Antje Worring as co-author on all papers. Synced PDFs to pdfs/ for download site.
105 lines
3.3 KiB
TeX
105 lines
3.3 KiB
TeX
\section{Comparison with Existing Frameworks}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{table}[h]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\small
|
|
\begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|}
|
|
\hline
|
|
\textbf{Feature} & \textbf{Lux DAO} & \textbf{Aragon} & \textbf{Compound} & \textbf{Moloch} \\
|
|
\hline
|
|
Modular voting strategies & \checkmark & Limited & $\times$ & $\times$ \\
|
|
Multiple token standards & \checkmark & \checkmark & $\times$ & $\times$ \\
|
|
Gasless voting & \checkmark & $\times$ & $\times$ & $\times$ \\
|
|
Role-based governance & \checkmark & Limited & $\times$ & $\times$ \\
|
|
Parent-child DAOs & \checkmark & $\times$ & $\times$ & $\times$ \\
|
|
Partial execution & \checkmark & $\times$ & $\times$ & $\times$ \\
|
|
Upgradeable & \checkmark & \checkmark & $\times$ & $\times$ \\
|
|
Safe integration & Native & Adapter & Adapter & $\times$ \\
|
|
Payment streaming & \checkmark & $\times$ & $\times$ & $\times$ \\
|
|
Token-bound accounts & \checkmark & $\times$ & $\times$ & $\times$ \\
|
|
Freeze mechanism & \checkmark & $\times$ & $\times$ & $\times$ \\
|
|
\hline
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
\caption{Governance Framework Feature Comparison}
|
|
\end{table}
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Detailed Analysis}
|
|
|
|
\subsubsection{Aragon}
|
|
|
|
\textbf{Strengths}:
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item Mature ecosystem with extensive tooling
|
|
\item App-based extensibility model
|
|
\item User-friendly DAO creation interface
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\textbf{Limitations vs. Lux DAO}:
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item No native account abstraction support
|
|
\item Tighter coupling between voting and execution
|
|
\item Complex upgrade mechanisms
|
|
\item No built-in hierarchical DAO support
|
|
\item Limited role management capabilities
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\subsubsection{Compound Governor}
|
|
|
|
\textbf{Strengths}:
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item Battle-tested in high-value DeFi protocols
|
|
\item Clean, auditable implementation
|
|
\item Industry-standard delegation patterns
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\textbf{Limitations vs. Lux DAO}:
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item Monolithic design prevents strategy swapping
|
|
\item Single token standard (ERC20 with delegation)
|
|
\item No gasless voting mechanism
|
|
\item Upgrades require full contract replacement
|
|
\item No role-based access control
|
|
\item No organizational hierarchy support
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\subsubsection{Moloch DAO}
|
|
|
|
\textbf{Strengths}:
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item Pioneering ragequit mechanism
|
|
\item Extreme simplicity and security
|
|
\item Low gas costs
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\textbf{Limitations vs. Lux DAO}:
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item Fixed governance model (no modularity)
|
|
\item One-member-one-vote only
|
|
\item No support for complex voting strategies
|
|
\item No account abstraction
|
|
\item Limited to guild/club use cases
|
|
\item No automation capabilities
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Performance Comparison}
|
|
|
|
\begin{table}[h]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|}
|
|
\hline
|
|
\textbf{Operation} & \textbf{Lux DAO} & \textbf{Aragon} & \textbf{Compound} & \textbf{Moloch} \\
|
|
\hline
|
|
Propose (gas) & 180k & 220k & 190k & 150k \\
|
|
Vote (gas) & 120k & 110k & 140k & 80k \\
|
|
Gasless vote (gas) & 0* & N/A & N/A & N/A \\
|
|
Execute (gas) & 95k & 150k & 100k & 200k \\
|
|
DAO creation (gas) & 2.1M & 2.5M & 800k & 500k \\
|
|
\hline
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
\caption{Gas Cost Comparison (*Paid by DAO treasury via paymaster)}
|
|
\end{table}
|
|
|
|
\textit{Note}: Measurements taken on Ethereum mainnet. Actual costs vary based on network conditions and proposal complexity.
|
|
|