Files
zeekay abf99d05fc papers: reorganize into per-paper dirs, add Antje Worring as co-author
Restructured from flat .tex/.pdf files into per-paper subdirectories.
Added Antje Worring as co-author on all papers.
Synced PDFs to pdfs/ for download site.
2026-04-18 21:50:07 -07:00

32 lines
1.6 KiB
TeX

\section{Related Work}
\label{sec:related}
Decentralized cloud computing has been explored across several
dimensions. Filecoin \cite{benet2017filecoin} provides decentralized
storage with proof-of-spacetime verification but does not address
compute, relay, or recovery services. Akash Network \cite{akash2020}
offers a decentralized compute marketplace but lacks client-side
encryption and chain-enforced SLAs. Golem \cite{golem2016} and
iExec \cite{iexec2017} provide decentralized compute but focus on
batch processing rather than real-time service markets.
The capsule architecture for user-owned encrypted data builds on
local-first software principles \cite{kleppmann2019localfirst} and
the Solid project's user-controlled data pods \cite{bernerslee2016solid}.
The Lux model extends these with chain-enforced SLAs, provider
reputation, and compute markets.
Threshold cryptography for recovery draws on Shamir's secret sharing
\cite{shamir1979share} and recent work on threshold ECDSA
\cite{gennaro2020frost} for distributed key management. The Lux
recovery provider model applies these primitives in a market context
where recovery availability is economically incentivized.
Provider reputation without surveillance relates to privacy-preserving
reputation systems studied by Androulaki et al.\ \cite{androulaki2008reputation}
and Kerschbaum \cite{kerschbaum2009reputation}. The Lux approach uses
on-chain verifiable signals rather than encrypted feedback, avoiding
the complexity of fully homomorphic reputation aggregation while
providing a practical privacy/accuracy tradeoff.