mirror of
https://github.com/lux-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-10-30 18:15:21 +00:00
Restructured from flat .tex/.pdf files into per-paper subdirectories. Added Antje Worring as co-author on all papers. Synced PDFs to pdfs/ for download site.
84 lines
3.8 KiB
TeX
84 lines
3.8 KiB
TeX
\section{Conclusion}
|
|
\label{sec:conclusion}
|
|
|
|
The centralized cloud model treats providers as data custodians who
|
|
extract rent from switching costs. The Lux provider model treats
|
|
providers as service markets competing on quality, with users retaining
|
|
ownership of their keys, their data, and their exit rights.
|
|
|
|
The key contributions of this paper are:
|
|
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\item \textbf{Five-role provider taxonomy.} Relay, storage, gateway,
|
|
recovery, and compute as separable, composable service roles, none of
|
|
which require custodial access to user data.
|
|
|
|
\item \textbf{Surveillance-free reputation.} A provider reputation
|
|
protocol based entirely on verifiable on-chain signals---receipt
|
|
completion, stake tenure, slashing history, proof-of-service---that
|
|
requires no inspection of user traffic.
|
|
|
|
\item \textbf{Chain-enforced SLAs.} Service level agreements as smart
|
|
contracts with automatic stake-backed penalties, replacing the legal
|
|
fiction of centralized SLA credits.
|
|
|
|
\item \textbf{Resource markets.} Continuous double-auction markets
|
|
for inference, storage, bandwidth, recovery, and gateway services
|
|
with second-price settlement and EIP-1559-style dynamic pricing.
|
|
|
|
\item \textbf{Provable portability.} A formal proof that users can
|
|
switch providers with zero data loss and bounded downtime, even under
|
|
Byzantine fault assumptions.
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
The decentralized cloud is not a replacement for AWS. It is a different
|
|
category of infrastructure: one where the user is sovereign, the provider
|
|
is a vendor, and exit is not a migration---it is a market transaction.
|
|
|
|
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{synergy2024cloud}
|
|
Synergy Research Group, ``Cloud infrastructure services market reaches \$76 billion in Q4 2024,'' \emph{Synergy Research Group Report}, 2024.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{aws2021outage}
|
|
Amazon Web Services, ``Summary of the AWS service event in the Northern Virginia (US-EAST-1) region,'' \emph{AWS Post-Event Summary}, December 2021.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{benet2017filecoin}
|
|
J.~Benet and N.~Greco, ``Filecoin: A decentralized storage network,'' \emph{Protocol Labs Technical Report}, 2017.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{akash2020}
|
|
G.~Gadiraju and A.~Prem, ``Akash Network: Decentralized cloud compute marketplace,'' \emph{Akash Network Whitepaper}, 2020.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{golem2016}
|
|
The Golem Project, ``The Golem Project: Crowdfunding whitepaper,'' \emph{Golem Factory Technical Report}, 2016.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{iexec2017}
|
|
G.~Fedak et al., ``iExec: Blockchain-based decentralized cloud computing,'' \emph{iExec Whitepaper}, 2017.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{kleppmann2019localfirst}
|
|
M.~Kleppmann, A.~Wiggins, P.~van~Hardenberg, and M.~McGranaghan, ``Local-first software: You own your data, in spite of the cloud,'' in \emph{Onward!}, ACM, 2019.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{bernerslee2016solid}
|
|
T.~Berners-Lee, ``Solid: A platform for decentralized social applications based on Linked Data,'' \emph{MIT CSAIL Technical Report}, 2016.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{shamir1979share}
|
|
A.~Shamir, ``How to share a secret,'' \emph{Communications of the ACM}, vol.~22, no.~11, pp.~612--613, 1979.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{gennaro2020frost}
|
|
R.~Gennaro and S.~Goldfeder, ``One round threshold ECDSA with identifiable abort,'' \emph{IACR ePrint 2020/540}, 2020.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{androulaki2008reputation}
|
|
E.~Androulaki, S.~G.~Choi, S.~M.~Bellovin, and T.~Malkin, ``Reputation systems for anonymous networks,'' in \emph{PETS}, Springer, 2008.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{kerschbaum2009reputation}
|
|
F.~Kerschbaum, ``A verifiable, centralized, coercion-free reputation system,'' in \emph{ACM WPES}, 2009.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{roughgarden2020eip1559}
|
|
T.~Roughgarden, ``Transaction fee mechanism design for the Ethereum blockchain: An economic analysis of EIP-1559,'' \emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.00854}, 2020.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{wood2016polkadot}
|
|
G.~Wood, ``Polkadot: Vision for a heterogeneous multi-chain framework,'' \emph{Polkadot Whitepaper}, 2016.
|
|
|
|
\end{thebibliography}
|
|
|