Files
zeekayandHanzo Dev 178febad68 papers: reconcile T-Chain -> M-Chain / F-Chain / B-Chain per LP-134
Every rendered "T-Chain" / "ThresholdVM" / "teleportvm" reference across
the paper corpus is rewritten to the correct canonical chain by concern:
threshold signing / MPC / bridge custody / key recovery -> M-Chain (MVM);
FHE / encrypted compute / threshold decryption -> F-Chain (FVM); teleport
/ cross-chain messaging -> B-Chain (bridgevm); consensus Pulsar stays
Q-Chain. Section lux-trust-kernel/03-t-chain-threshold-governance.tex
renamed -> 03-f-chain-encrypted-policy.tex (with \input + xref fixes).
Braided "T-Chain" sections split by concern (M vs F). Only lp-020's
chain-separation rationale and the shared lux/chains/thresholdvm library
path retain the name, to record the removal. All changed papers rebuilt
(pdflatex, rc=0, no undefined refs).

§09 of lux-dao-governance-framework reframed: fabricated "production
deployment" metrics ($50M/$240k/$12M, survey %s, "as of Oct 2024")
relabeled as illustrative design configurations with no invented
replacements; reality noted (DAO treasury is a 1/1 Safe); conclusion
echo + one "first production" overclaim softened.

This commit also captures concurrent corpus workstreams on the same tree.

Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
2026-07-02 00:57:09 -07:00

44 lines
1.6 KiB
TeX

%% ===================================================================
%% LP-134 canonical naming (2025-12-15):
%% Per LP-134 (Lux Chain Topology), T-Chain has been split into:
%% M-Chain — MPC ceremonies for bridge custody of EXTERNAL wallets
%% (CGGMP21, FROST, Pulsar-general)
%% F-Chain — FHE compute + TFHE bootstrap-key generation (encrypted EVM)
%% T-Chain is REMOVED entirely; teleport is B-Chain (bridgevm, LP-6000). No teleportvm.
%% Where this paper says "F-Chain MPC" / "F-Chain threshold governance" /
%% "F-Chain TFHE" / "F-Chain custody", read as M-Chain (MPC) or F-Chain (FHE).
%% ===================================================================
\section{EVM Integration}
FHE operations are exposed as EVM precompiles on Lux C-Chain:
\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\small
\begin{tabular}{@{}ll@{}}
\toprule
\textbf{Precompile} & \textbf{FHE Operation} \\
\midrule
FHEAdd, FHESub, FHEMul & Encrypted integer arithmetic \\
FHEEq, FHELt, FHEGt, FHELe, FHEGe & Encrypted comparison \\
FHEAnd, FHEOr, FHEXor, FHENot & Encrypted bitwise \\
TrivialEncrypt & Plaintext $\to$ ciphertext (public value) \\
Decrypt, Reencrypt & Async decryption via F-Chain \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\caption{FHE EVM precompiles at addresses \texttt{0x0200...0080}--\texttt{0x0200...0083}.}
\label{tab:precompiles}
\end{table}
Solidity developers interact via the \texttt{@luxfi/contracts} library:
\begin{lstlisting}[language=Java]
import "@luxfi/contracts/FHE.sol";
euint32 a = FHE.asEuint32(encrypted_input);
euint32 b = FHE.add(a, FHE.asEuint32(10));
\end{lstlisting}