Files
zeekay abf99d05fc papers: reorganize into per-paper dirs, add Antje Worring as co-author
Restructured from flat .tex/.pdf files into per-paper subdirectories.
Added Antje Worring as co-author on all papers.
Synced PDFs to pdfs/ for download site.
2026-04-18 21:50:07 -07:00

34 lines
1.9 KiB
TeX

\section{Introduction}
\label{sec:introduction}
The metastable consensus protocols---Slush, Flare, and Wave---operate on binary conflicts:
each conflict set has two possible outcomes, and the protocol converges to one. Many
blockchain applications, however, involve $d$-valued conflicts: multiple conflicting
transactions spending the same UTXO, multiple candidate blocks at the same height, or
multi-party auction outcomes. Extending binary protocols to $d > 2$ requires either
running $\log_2 d$ binary instances (inefficient) or redesigning the convergence mechanism.
The Field protocol draws on the physics of electromagnetic alignment to provide a natural
multi-valued extension. Instead of binary colors, each validator maintains a preference
vector $\mathbf{p}_i \in \mathbb{R}^d$ on the $(d-1)$-simplex. Sampling interactions
rotate preference vectors toward the sampled majority, analogous to magnetic dipoles
aligning under an external field. The field potential function $\Phi$ provides a
Lyapunov function for the dynamics, guaranteeing convergence without requiring
binary decomposition.
\paragraph{Contributions.}
\begin{enumerate}[nosep]
\item The Field protocol: a multi-valued metastable consensus mechanism with
electromagnetic-inspired dynamics (\S\ref{sec:protocol}).
\item A field potential function $\Phi$ that is non-increasing under the protocol,
providing a Lyapunov convergence proof (\S\ref{sec:potential}).
\item Extension to stake-weighted sampling via field strength gradients (\S\ref{sec:stake}).
\item Phase transition analysis characterizing the convergence boundary (\S\ref{sec:phase}).
\item Empirical evaluation of $d$-valued consensus for $d = 2, 4, 8, 16$ (\S\ref{sec:evaluation}).
\end{enumerate}
%% -----------------------------------------------------------------------
%% 2. ELECTROMAGNETIC ANALOGY
%% -----------------------------------------------------------------------