mirror of
https://github.com/lux-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-10-30 18:15:21 +00:00
Restructured from flat .tex/.pdf files into per-paper subdirectories. Added Antje Worring as co-author on all papers. Synced PDFs to pdfs/ for download site.
34 lines
1.9 KiB
TeX
34 lines
1.9 KiB
TeX
\section{Introduction}
|
|
|
|
\label{sec:introduction}
|
|
|
|
The metastable consensus protocols---Slush, Flare, and Wave---operate on binary conflicts:
|
|
each conflict set has two possible outcomes, and the protocol converges to one. Many
|
|
blockchain applications, however, involve $d$-valued conflicts: multiple conflicting
|
|
transactions spending the same UTXO, multiple candidate blocks at the same height, or
|
|
multi-party auction outcomes. Extending binary protocols to $d > 2$ requires either
|
|
running $\log_2 d$ binary instances (inefficient) or redesigning the convergence mechanism.
|
|
|
|
The Field protocol draws on the physics of electromagnetic alignment to provide a natural
|
|
multi-valued extension. Instead of binary colors, each validator maintains a preference
|
|
vector $\mathbf{p}_i \in \mathbb{R}^d$ on the $(d-1)$-simplex. Sampling interactions
|
|
rotate preference vectors toward the sampled majority, analogous to magnetic dipoles
|
|
aligning under an external field. The field potential function $\Phi$ provides a
|
|
Lyapunov function for the dynamics, guaranteeing convergence without requiring
|
|
binary decomposition.
|
|
|
|
\paragraph{Contributions.}
|
|
\begin{enumerate}[nosep]
|
|
\item The Field protocol: a multi-valued metastable consensus mechanism with
|
|
electromagnetic-inspired dynamics (\S\ref{sec:protocol}).
|
|
\item A field potential function $\Phi$ that is non-increasing under the protocol,
|
|
providing a Lyapunov convergence proof (\S\ref{sec:potential}).
|
|
\item Extension to stake-weighted sampling via field strength gradients (\S\ref{sec:stake}).
|
|
\item Phase transition analysis characterizing the convergence boundary (\S\ref{sec:phase}).
|
|
\item Empirical evaluation of $d$-valued consensus for $d = 2, 4, 8, 16$ (\S\ref{sec:evaluation}).
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
%% -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
%% 2. ELECTROMAGNETIC ANALOGY
|
|
%% -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|