Files
zeekay f4ee7a0525 Publish under the org, not a person
Bylines, paper authorship, correspondence addresses and the founder blurb under
each post named an individual. They name the organisation that published the
work instead: the brand on posts and pages, the research byline on papers, and
research@ in place of a personal address. Both are what these repositories
already used elsewhere — nothing new was coined.

Co-authors are untouched. Where a paper named someone else alongside, they stay
named; only the one byline changed. Bibliography entries, running heads,
PDF metadata and affiliations move with it, so a citation still resolves to
whoever the cited paper names.

Sample and fixture data uses the placeholder name these tests already use
elsewhere, so no assertion changed meaning.
2026-09-01 08:58:10 -07:00

65 lines
2.6 KiB
TeX

\documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{../shared/luxcover}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{algorithm}
\usepackage{algpseudocode}
\usepackage{listings}
\input{../shared/lstlang}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\usepackage{booktabs}
% Code listings setup
\lstset{
language=Solidity,
basicstyle=\small\ttfamily,
keywordstyle=\color{blue}\bfseries,
commentstyle=\color{gray},
stringstyle=\color{red},
breaklines=true,
frame=single,
numbers=left,
numberstyle=\tiny\color{gray},
captionpos=b
}
\title{Lux Governance: Unified DAO Framework for Multi-Ecosystem Coordination}
\author{
Lux Research\thanks{Corresponding author: [email protected]}\\
\textit{Lux Industries Inc}\\
\texttt{[email protected]}
}
\date{2023}
\begin{document}
\luxcoverpage
\begin{abstract}
We present Lux Governance, a unified decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) framework designed to coordinate protocol evolution across three interconnected ecosystems: Lux (blockchain infrastructure), Zoo (DeFi and NFT marketplace), and Hanzo (AI infrastructure). The system implements on-chain voting through smart contracts, combines token-weighted governance with validator participation, and introduces holographic consensus for scalable decision-making. Through the Lux Proposal (LP) standardization process, cross-chain voting mechanisms, and quantum-secure signature aggregation, the framework enables 10,000+ active governance participants to coordinate protocol upgrades, economic parameters, and treasury management while maintaining security and decentralization. This paper details the DAO architecture, voting mechanisms, LP lifecycle, cross-ecosystem coordination protocols, and incentive structures that have successfully governed \$2.8B in total value locked across all three networks.
\end{abstract}
\input{sections/01-introduction}
\input{sections/02-dao-architecture}
\input{sections/03-holographic-consensus}
\input{sections/04-lp-lux-proposal-standardization-process}
\input{sections/05-on-chain-voting-implementation}
\input{sections/06-cross-ecosystem-coordination}
\input{sections/07-validator-participation}
\input{sections/08-incentive-structures}
\input{sections/09-security-and-attack-prevention}
\input{sections/10-dao-treasury-management}
\input{sections/11-historical-performance}
\input{sections/12-tools-and-infrastructure}
\input{sections/13-comparison-with-other-daos}
\input{sections/14-future-enhancements}
\input{sections/15-conclusion}
\input{sections/17-acknowledgments}
\input{sections/18-appendix-a-lp-template}
\input{sections/99-references}
\end{document}