mirror of
https://github.com/lux-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-10-30 18:15:21 +00:00
zeekayandHanzo Dev
178febad68
Every rendered "T-Chain" / "ThresholdVM" / "teleportvm" reference across the paper corpus is rewritten to the correct canonical chain by concern: threshold signing / MPC / bridge custody / key recovery -> M-Chain (MVM); FHE / encrypted compute / threshold decryption -> F-Chain (FVM); teleport / cross-chain messaging -> B-Chain (bridgevm); consensus Pulsar stays Q-Chain. Section lux-trust-kernel/03-t-chain-threshold-governance.tex renamed -> 03-f-chain-encrypted-policy.tex (with \input + xref fixes). Braided "T-Chain" sections split by concern (M vs F). Only lp-020's chain-separation rationale and the shared lux/chains/thresholdvm library path retain the name, to record the removal. All changed papers rebuilt (pdflatex, rc=0, no undefined refs). ยง09 of lux-dao-governance-framework reframed: fabricated "production deployment" metrics ($50M/$240k/$12M, survey %s, "as of Oct 2024") relabeled as illustrative design configurations with no invented replacements; reality noted (DAO treasury is a 1/1 Safe); conclusion echo + one "first production" overclaim softened. This commit also captures concurrent corpus workstreams on the same tree. Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
54 lines
2.2 KiB
TeX
54 lines
2.2 KiB
TeX
\section{Introduction}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\subsection{The Multi-Ecosystem Governance Challenge}
|
|
|
|
Decentralized governance faces critical challenges when coordinating multiple interconnected blockchain ecosystems:
|
|
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\item \textbf{Fragmented Decision-Making}: Each protocol requires separate governance processes
|
|
\item \textbf{Voter Fatigue}: Token holders overwhelmed by numerous proposals
|
|
\item \textbf{Coordination Failures}: Changes in one ecosystem impact others without coordination
|
|
\item \textbf{Attack Vectors}: Governance attacks exploit vulnerabilities across ecosystems
|
|
\item \textbf{Low Participation}: Most DAOs see <5\% voter participation rates
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Lux Governance Solution}
|
|
|
|
Lux Governance introduces a unified framework addressing these challenges through:
|
|
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\item \textbf{Holographic Consensus}: Scalable governance without gridlock
|
|
\item \textbf{LP Standardization Process}: Structured proposal lifecycle from ideation to activation
|
|
\item \textbf{Cross-Ecosystem Coordination}: Smart contracts enabling multi-chain voting
|
|
\item \textbf{Validator Participation}: Enhanced voting weight for technical proposals
|
|
\item \textbf{Incentive Alignment}: Rewards for participation, quality proposals, and reviews
|
|
\item \textbf{Quantum Security}: BLS + Pulsar dual signatures for governance votes
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Design Targets}
|
|
|
|
The quantitative figures throughout this paper are illustrative design targets
|
|
and projections for the governance framework at scale --- they are not measured
|
|
production data. The live Lux DAO treasury today is a single-signer (1/1) Safe
|
|
custody holding the consolidated treasury; the multi-participant token-voting
|
|
figures below describe the target operating point the framework is built toward.
|
|
|
|
\begin{table}[h]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\begin{tabular}{@{}lr@{}}
|
|
\toprule
|
|
\textbf{Metric} & \textbf{Target Value} \\ \midrule
|
|
Active Governance Participants & 12,847 \\
|
|
Total LPs Processed & 287 \\
|
|
Average Voter Participation & 18.3\% \\
|
|
LPs Activated & 94 \\
|
|
Treasury Value & \$128M \\
|
|
Cross-Ecosystem Proposals & 23 \\
|
|
Average Voting Period & 7.2 days \\
|
|
Governance Attack Attempts & 0 successful \\ \bottomrule
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
\caption{Lux Governance design targets (illustrative; not measured production data)}
|
|
\end{table}
|
|
|