mirror of
https://github.com/lux-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-11-02 11:39:52 +00:00
zeekayandHanzo Dev
178febad68
Every rendered "T-Chain" / "ThresholdVM" / "teleportvm" reference across the paper corpus is rewritten to the correct canonical chain by concern: threshold signing / MPC / bridge custody / key recovery -> M-Chain (MVM); FHE / encrypted compute / threshold decryption -> F-Chain (FVM); teleport / cross-chain messaging -> B-Chain (bridgevm); consensus Pulsar stays Q-Chain. Section lux-trust-kernel/03-t-chain-threshold-governance.tex renamed -> 03-f-chain-encrypted-policy.tex (with \input + xref fixes). Braided "T-Chain" sections split by concern (M vs F). Only lp-020's chain-separation rationale and the shared lux/chains/thresholdvm library path retain the name, to record the removal. All changed papers rebuilt (pdflatex, rc=0, no undefined refs). §09 of lux-dao-governance-framework reframed: fabricated "production deployment" metrics ($50M/$240k/$12M, survey %s, "as of Oct 2024") relabeled as illustrative design configurations with no invented replacements; reality noted (DAO treasury is a 1/1 Safe); conclusion echo + one "first production" overclaim softened. This commit also captures concurrent corpus workstreams on the same tree. Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
109 lines
3.3 KiB
TeX
109 lines
3.3 KiB
TeX
\section{DAO Architecture}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Three-Tier Governance Structure}
|
||
|
||
\begin{figure}[h]
|
||
\centering
|
||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||
+---------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| Cross-Ecosystem Coordination |
|
||
| (Multi-chain proposals affecting all ecosystems) |
|
||
+--------------+--------------+--------------+------------+
|
||
| | |
|
||
+----------v-----+ +----v-----+ +----v----------+
|
||
| Lux DAO | | Zoo DAO | | Hanzo DAO |
|
||
| | | | | |
|
||
| * Consensus | | * DeFi | | * AI Models |
|
||
| * Bridge | | * NFTs | | * Compute |
|
||
| * Appchains | | * Gaming | | * Inference |
|
||
+----------------+ +----------+ +---------------+
|
||
\end{verbatim}
|
||
\caption{Three-tier DAO architecture}
|
||
\end{figure}
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Lux DAO}
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Primary Focus}: Blockchain protocol governance
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Token}: LUX (native token)
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Governance Scope}:
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item Consensus mechanism upgrades (Nova, Quasar)
|
||
\item Network economic parameters (block rewards, fees, staking)
|
||
\item Bridge security and validator sets
|
||
\item Appchain creation and management
|
||
\item Treasury allocation and grants
|
||
\item LP standardization process
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Voting Power Calculation}:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
VP_{Lux} = \text{Stake}_{LUX} \times (1 + \text{Reputation}) \times \text{Delegation Factor}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
|
||
Where:
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item $\text{Stake}_{LUX}$: Amount of LUX staked in governance contract
|
||
\item $\text{Reputation}$: 0-0.5× multiplier based on participation history
|
||
\item $\text{Delegation Factor}$: 1.0 for self-voting, 0.8 for delegated votes
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Zoo DAO}
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Primary Focus}: DeFi and NFT marketplace governance
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Token}: ZOO (BSC-based BEP-20 token)
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Governance Scope}:
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item NFT marketplace fees and policies
|
||
\item DeFi protocol parameters (AMM, lending, staking)
|
||
\item Gaming integration and metaverse features
|
||
\item DAO treasury investments
|
||
\item Partnership proposals
|
||
\item Brand and marketing decisions
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Voting Power Calculation}:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
VP_{Zoo} = \text{Stake}_{ZOO} + \text{NFT}_{holdings} \times 0.3 + \text{LP}_{tokens} \times 0.5
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
|
||
Where:
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item $\text{Stake}_{ZOO}$: ZOO tokens locked in governance
|
||
\item $\text{NFT}_{holdings}$: Value of Zoo NFTs held (normalized)
|
||
\item $\text{LP}_{tokens}$: Liquidity provider tokens in Zoo pools
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Hanzo DAO}
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Primary Focus}: AI infrastructure governance
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Token}: HANZO (AI compute credits convertible to governance power)
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Governance Scope}:
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item AI model registry and verification
|
||
\item Compute marketplace pricing and policies
|
||
\item TEE attestation standards (A-Chain)
|
||
\item Jin architecture upgrades
|
||
\item MCP (Model Context Protocol) extensions
|
||
\item AI safety and ethical AI guidelines
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|
||
\textbf{Voting Power Calculation}:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
VP_{Hanzo} = \text{Stake}_{HANZO} + \text{Compute}_{provided} \times 0.4 + \text{Model}_{quality} \times 0.2
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
|
||
Where:
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item $\text{Stake}_{HANZO}$: HANZO tokens staked
|
||
\item $\text{Compute}_{provided}$: TEE compute contributed (normalized)
|
||
\item $\text{Model}_{quality}$: Quality score of AI models published
|
||
\end{itemize}
|
||
|