Files
papers/lux-governance-dao/sections/05-on-chain-voting-implementation.tex
zeekayandHanzo Dev 178febad68 papers: reconcile T-Chain -> M-Chain / F-Chain / B-Chain per LP-134
Every rendered "T-Chain" / "ThresholdVM" / "teleportvm" reference across
the paper corpus is rewritten to the correct canonical chain by concern:
threshold signing / MPC / bridge custody / key recovery -> M-Chain (MVM);
FHE / encrypted compute / threshold decryption -> F-Chain (FVM); teleport
/ cross-chain messaging -> B-Chain (bridgevm); consensus Pulsar stays
Q-Chain. Section lux-trust-kernel/03-t-chain-threshold-governance.tex
renamed -> 03-f-chain-encrypted-policy.tex (with \input + xref fixes).
Braided "T-Chain" sections split by concern (M vs F). Only lp-020's
chain-separation rationale and the shared lux/chains/thresholdvm library
path retain the name, to record the removal. All changed papers rebuilt
(pdflatex, rc=0, no undefined refs).

ยง09 of lux-dao-governance-framework reframed: fabricated "production
deployment" metrics ($50M/$240k/$12M, survey %s, "as of Oct 2024")
relabeled as illustrative design configurations with no invented
replacements; reality noted (DAO treasury is a 1/1 Safe); conclusion
echo + one "first production" overclaim softened.

This commit also captures concurrent corpus workstreams on the same tree.

Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
2026-07-02 00:57:09 -07:00

159 lines
4.7 KiB
TeX

\section{On-Chain Voting Implementation}
The on-chain substrate for Lux Governance is the Azorius modular framework: a
Safe treasury with a Zodiac-pattern Azorius execution module and pluggable
voting-strategy contracts, augmented with ERC-4337 gasless voting, Hats Protocol
roles, and ERC-6551 token-bound sub-accounts. That substrate is specified in the
companion \emph{Lux DAO: Modular Governance Framework} paper and is the canonical
governance implementation. The interfaces in this section describe the
Lux-specific coordination and voting-strategy logic layered on top of that
Azorius substrate --- proposal typing, validator-weighted votes, and
cross-ecosystem aggregation --- rather than a replacement for it. All execution
resolves through the Safe; all role gating resolves through Hats.
\subsection{Governance Smart Contract}
\begin{lstlisting}[language=Solidity,caption=Core governance contract interface]
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
pragma solidity ^0.8.20;
interface ILuxGovernance {
struct Proposal {
uint256 id;
address proposer;
string ipfsHash; // LP document on IPFS
ProposalType proposalType;
uint256 startBlock;
uint256 endBlock;
uint256 forVotes;
uint256 againstVotes;
uint256 abstainVotes;
bool executed;
mapping(address => Vote) votes;
}
enum ProposalType {
Standard, // Simple majority
Protocol, // Supermajority + validators
Economic, // Weighted voting
Emergency // Fast-track
}
enum Vote { None, For, Against, Abstain }
// Create new proposal
function propose(
string calldata ipfsHash,
ProposalType pType,
bytes calldata data
) external returns (uint256 proposalId);
// Cast vote with token weight
function castVote(
uint256 proposalId,
Vote vote
) external;
// Validators cast enhanced vote
function castValidatorVote(
uint256 proposalId,
Vote vote,
bytes calldata validatorProof
) external;
// Execute approved proposal
function execute(uint256 proposalId) external;
// Query proposal status
function getProposal(uint256 proposalId)
external view returns (Proposal memory);
}
\end{lstlisting}
\subsection{Voting Power Calculation}
\begin{lstlisting}[language=Solidity,caption=Voting power calculation with reputation]
contract VotingPower {
// Base voting power from staked tokens
function calculateBaseVotingPower(address voter)
public view returns (uint256)
{
return stakingContract.balanceOf(voter);
}
// Reputation multiplier (0-50% boost)
function calculateReputation(address voter)
public view returns (uint256)
{
uint256 participationCount =
governanceHistory.getParticipationCount(voter);
uint256 proposalQuality =
governanceHistory.getProposalQuality(voter);
// Reputation = 0.3 * participation + 0.2 * quality
// Max reputation: 0.5 (50% boost)
uint256 reputation =
(participationCount * 300 / 1000) +
(proposalQuality * 200 / 1000);
return min(reputation, 500); // Cap at 50%
}
// Final voting power
function getVotingPower(address voter)
public view returns (uint256)
{
uint256 base = calculateBaseVotingPower(voter);
uint256 reputation = calculateReputation(voter);
// VP = base * (1 + reputation)
return base * (1000 + reputation) / 1000;
}
}
\end{lstlisting}
\subsection{Quantum-Secure Vote Aggregation}
Votes are secured using dual-certificate signatures (BLS + Pulsar):
\begin{lstlisting}[language=Solidity,caption=Quantum-secure vote verification]
contract QuantumSecureVoting {
struct DualSignature {
bytes blsSignature; // 48 bytes
bytes pulsarSignature; // ~2.5KB
}
function verifyVote(
address voter,
uint256 proposalId,
Vote vote,
DualSignature calldata sig
) public view returns (bool) {
bytes32 message = keccak256(abi.encodePacked(
voter, proposalId, vote
));
// Verify both signatures (classical + quantum-safe)
bool blsValid = verifyBLS(
voter, message, sig.blsSignature
);
bool pulsarValid = verifyPulsar(
voter, message, sig.pulsarSignature
);
return blsValid && pulsarValid;
}
// BLS signature aggregation for efficiency
function aggregateVotes(
DualSignature[] calldata signatures
) public pure returns (bytes memory aggregatedBLS) {
// BLS signatures can be aggregated O(1)
return bls.aggregate(extractBLS(signatures));
}
}
\end{lstlisting}