mirror of
https://github.com/lux-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-11-02 11:39:52 +00:00
zeekayandHanzo Dev
178febad68
Every rendered "T-Chain" / "ThresholdVM" / "teleportvm" reference across the paper corpus is rewritten to the correct canonical chain by concern: threshold signing / MPC / bridge custody / key recovery -> M-Chain (MVM); FHE / encrypted compute / threshold decryption -> F-Chain (FVM); teleport / cross-chain messaging -> B-Chain (bridgevm); consensus Pulsar stays Q-Chain. Section lux-trust-kernel/03-t-chain-threshold-governance.tex renamed -> 03-f-chain-encrypted-policy.tex (with \input + xref fixes). Braided "T-Chain" sections split by concern (M vs F). Only lp-020's chain-separation rationale and the shared lux/chains/thresholdvm library path retain the name, to record the removal. All changed papers rebuilt (pdflatex, rc=0, no undefined refs). ยง09 of lux-dao-governance-framework reframed: fabricated "production deployment" metrics ($50M/$240k/$12M, survey %s, "as of Oct 2024") relabeled as illustrative design configurations with no invented replacements; reality noted (DAO treasury is a 1/1 Safe); conclusion echo + one "first production" overclaim softened. This commit also captures concurrent corpus workstreams on the same tree. Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
40 lines
1.4 KiB
TeX
40 lines
1.4 KiB
TeX
\section{Projected Adoption Trajectory}
|
|
|
|
The figures in this section are illustrative projections and design targets for
|
|
the framework at scale, not measured historical data. Proposal identifiers are
|
|
schematic examples.
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Illustrative Proposal Lifecycle Examples}
|
|
|
|
\begin{table}[h]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\begin{tabular}{@{}lllr@{}}
|
|
\toprule
|
|
\textbf{LP} & \textbf{Title} & \textbf{Status} & \textbf{Vote} \\ \midrule
|
|
LP-110 & Quasar Consensus & Activated & 87.2\% For \\
|
|
LP-204 & secp256r1 Support & Activated & 92.1\% For \\
|
|
LP-301 & Bridge Upgrade & Activated & 78.5\% For \\
|
|
LP-302 & Z-Chain Privacy & Activated & 81.3\% For \\
|
|
LP-303 & Quantum Security & In Progress & - \\
|
|
LP-304 & Lux Credit & Proposed & - \\ \bottomrule
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
\caption{Illustrative proposal lifecycle examples (schematic; not measured outcomes)}
|
|
\end{table}
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Projected Participation Trajectory}
|
|
|
|
\begin{table}[h]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\begin{tabular}{@{}lrrr@{}}
|
|
\toprule
|
|
\textbf{Milestone} & \textbf{Active Voters} & \textbf{LPs Voted} & \textbf{Avg Participation} \\ \midrule
|
|
Quarter 1 & 4,821 & 12 & 14.2\% \\
|
|
Quarter 2 & 7,143 & 18 & 15.8\% \\
|
|
Quarter 3 & 9,582 & 21 & 17.1\% \\
|
|
Quarter 4 & 12,847 & 23 & 18.3\% \\ \midrule
|
|
\textbf{Growth} & \textbf{+166\%} & \textbf{+92\%} & \textbf{+29\%} \\ \bottomrule
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
\caption{Projected governance participation trajectory (illustrative targets)}
|
|
\end{table}
|
|
|