Files
zeekayandHanzo Dev 70f6883235 Restore the regulated-markets papers; Lux holds the licences
A July commit removed eight papers on the premise "no license — DEX/non-custodial
only". That premise is wrong: Lux operates an ATS, a broker-dealer, a transfer
agent and a bank, and this material is resold at lux.financial. The merge that
brought main in preserved the removal because the commit stated a reason, which
is how a stale reason outlives the fact it rested on.

Back, at the versions main carried — main never received the removal, so its
copies are the later ones: the ATS architecture, the security-token standard,
smart order routing, institutional custody, MPC custody, post-quantum securities,
the SSB partnership and the CoinBridge brief. 83 files.

Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
2026-08-30 15:58:05 -07:00

113 lines
4.0 KiB
TeX

\section{Disaster Recovery}
\label{sec:dr}
%% =====================================================================
The architecture distinguishes \emph{availability} loss (a share is
unreachable) from \emph{authority} loss (a share has been compromised).
Both must be recoverable; the recovery procedures differ.
\subsection{Failure Modes}
\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\small
\begin{tabular}{p{4cm}p{4cm}p{6cm}}
\toprule
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Type} & \textbf{Recovery} \\
\midrule
One cold share unreachable (cloud outage) &
Availability &
Use any other 3-of-4 quorum; no action required \\
Two cold shares unreachable (regional disaster) &
Availability &
Use the remaining 3-of-3 quorum; investigate root cause; consider
re-DKG \\
Three or more cold shares unreachable &
Availability &
Sealed-envelope recovery; M-Chain transcript replay; full re-DKG \\
One cold share compromised (key extracted) &
Authority &
Proactive refresh on remaining shares; full re-DKG; rotate
operational credentials \\
Two cold shares compromised &
Authority &
Emergency full re-DKG; consider tier-2 emergency drain to a new
public key \\
Cloud KMS provider compromise (hot tier) &
Authority &
24-hour time-lock buys time; pause trading; rotate hot-tier keys \\
Vault site physical compromise &
Authority &
Treat as one share authority loss; FIPS L3 device tamper response
should zeroise; re-DKG \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\caption{Failure modes and recovery.}
\label{tab:failures}
\end{table}
\subsection{Sealed-Envelope Recovery Procedure}
The sealed-envelope recovery is the architecture's residual-risk
floor. It is exercised only when three or more cold shares are
simultaneously unrecoverable. The procedure:
\begin{enumerate}[nosep]
\item Custody Lead and a second authorised principal travel to all
three vault locations (US, Switzerland, Singapore).
\item Each envelope is inspected by both principals before opening;
tamper-evident seals are photographed.
\item The three Shamir shards $P_1, P_2, P_3$ are reassembled to
recover passphrase $P$.
\item $P$ is used to decrypt the M-Chain-stored encrypted ceremony
transcript.
\item The transcript is replayed inside a freshly provisioned SCIF
on freshly procured hardware; share material is reconstructed.
\item A new ceremony then runs to migrate to a new public key; the
old key is retired and any remaining assets at the old key are
moved.
\end{enumerate}
This procedure takes approximately seven days end-to-end and is
intentionally slow.
\subsection{Quarterly Live Drill}
A live disaster-recovery drill is run quarterly. One real share is
taken offline (cycled across shares quarter-to-quarter so that every
share is exercised over a multi-quarter window) and a real signing
ceremony is completed using the remaining quorum. The drill is
recorded on M-Chain and reviewed at the next quarterly board meeting.
\subsection{Insurance Interaction}
The crime-and-specie policy distinguishes \emph{authority} loss
(insured up to policy tower) from \emph{availability} loss (not
insured but bounded by SLAs). The architecture's recovery procedures
are designed so that an availability incident never escalates to an
authority incident: the time-lock on the hot tier, the four-eyes
review on the warm tier, and the airgap on the cold tier ensure that
an attacker cannot leverage an availability incident to forge a
signature.
\subsection{Business Continuity}
In the event of a sustained availability incident on the warm tier
(e.g.\ a multi-day cloud outage at two of three providers), trading
operations fall back to one of two contingencies:
\begin{enumerate}[nosep]
\item \textbf{Tier-2 elevation of a hot share.} A hot share's
spending cap can be temporarily raised, subject to Custody Lead
approval, to maintain trading-desk liquidity for up to seventy-two
hours.
\item \textbf{Cold-tier emergency draw.} A cold ceremony can be
scheduled within twenty-four hours to refill the warm tier from
cold reserves.
\end{enumerate}
Either contingency is logged and reviewed at the next monthly review.
%% =====================================================================