Files
papers/lux-liquid-staking/sections/11-comparison-with-existing-protocols.tex
zeekay abf99d05fc papers: reorganize into per-paper dirs, add Antje Worring as co-author
Restructured from flat .tex/.pdf files into per-paper subdirectories.
Added Antje Worring as co-author on all papers.
Synced PDFs to pdfs/ for download site.
2026-04-18 21:50:07 -07:00

22 lines
901 B
TeX

\section{Comparison with Existing Protocols}
\label{sec:comparison}
\begin{table}[H]
\centering
\caption{Liquid staking protocol comparison.}
\label{tab:comparison}
\begin{tabular}{p{2.5cm}p{2cm}p{2cm}p{2cm}p{2cm}p{2cm}}
\toprule
\textbf{Feature} & \textbf{LLS (Lux)} & \textbf{Lido (Eth)} & \textbf{Rocket Pool} & \textbf{Marinade (Sol)} & \textbf{Stride (Cosmos)} \\
\midrule
Token model & Dual (rebase + wrap) & Rebase & Exchange rate & Exchange rate & Exchange rate \\
Validator count & $\geq 20$ & $\sim 30$ & Permissionless & $\sim 400$ & $\sim 50$ \\
Slashing insurance & Yes (5\% fee) & No & RPL collateral & No & No \\
Max validator share & 10\% & $\sim 5\%$ & None (small) & 3.3\% & Variable \\
Withdrawal time & 14 days & Variable & Variable & 1--2 epochs & 21 days \\
Fee & 10\% rewards & 10\% rewards & 15\% rewards & 6\% rewards & 10\% rewards \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}