mirror of
https://github.com/lux-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-10-30 18:15:21 +00:00
zeekay
9504b4c3ef
Sweep across the non-Tier-1 paper catalogue (Tier-1 owned by parallel
agent and excluded). All 113 processed papers already had luxcover
wired up; this commit fixes 14 build breakers and produces fresh
PDFs across the catalogue.
Fixes:
- lux-blockchain-scaling-laws: em-dash inside lstlisting -> --
- lux-corona-pq: stale \input pointing at 03-the-corona-scheme renamed
to 03-the-corona-scheme (file already renamed on disk)
- lux-lattice-cryptography-primer: same Corona->Corona rename
- lux-formal-verification-lean4: Lean source uses unicode (×, ∀, ∃, ∈,
∧, ∨, ∩, ≠, ⟨, ⟩, ·, ¬) inside lstlistings. Added a literate map
so listings render the math glyphs without UTF-8 fault.
- lux-id-did-specification: ✓/✗ in tabular replaced with \ding{51}
/ \ding{55} (pifont). Added pifont package.
- lux-ntt-simd-implementation: middle-dot in Go assembly listings;
added literate {·}{\textperiodcentered}.
- lux-ntt-transform: μ, ×, –, — in regular text (no T1 fontenc).
Replaced with $\mu$/$\times$/--/--- via unicode->latex sweep.
- lux-perpetuals-derivatives, lux-quantum-consensus,
lux-quasar-consensus, lux-tee-computing-mesh: same unicode->latex
sweep across body text. Also fixed broken math segment
`$L_{avg} = 10$\times$$` -> `$L_{avg} = 10\times$`.
- lux-zchain: emoji glyphs in roadmap table replaced with
parenthetical text.
- lux-triple-proof-consensus: dropped duplicate \usepackage{geometry}
that clashed with luxcover (geometry option clash).
- pq: defined missing \Rq macro.
PDFs rebuilt for the full Tier-2/3 set.
Excluded (Tier-1, parallel agent): lp-073-pulsar, lp-stricte2epq,
dag-evm-formal, lp-010-quasar-stm-{3,4}, lp-020-quasar-consensus,
lux-institutional-custody, lux-nist-mptc-submission, pqsafe-il5,
pq-rns, plus shared/ and lps/.
61 lines
1.4 KiB
TeX
61 lines
1.4 KiB
TeX
\section{Benchmark Results}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Comprehensive Performance Metrics}
|
|
|
|
\begin{table}[h]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\caption{NTT Operation Benchmarks}
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lrrr}
|
|
\toprule
|
|
Operation & Size & Gas Cost & Time (ms) \\
|
|
\midrule
|
|
NTT-256 & 256 & 580K & 58 \\
|
|
NTT-512 & 512 & 1.2M & 120 \\
|
|
NTT-1024 & 1024 & 2.8M & 280 \\
|
|
NTT-2048 & 2048 & 6.5M & 650 \\
|
|
\midrule
|
|
INTT-256 & 256 & 610K & 61 \\
|
|
INTT-512 & 512 & 1.3M & 130 \\
|
|
INTT-1024 & 1024 & 3.0M & 300 \\
|
|
INTT-2048 & 2048 & 6.9M & 690 \\
|
|
\bottomrule
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
\end{table}
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Algorithm-Specific Benchmarks}
|
|
|
|
\begin{table}[h]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\caption{Complete Verification Benchmarks}
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lrrr}
|
|
\toprule
|
|
Algorithm & Original & Optimized & Reduction \\
|
|
\midrule
|
|
FALCON-512 verify & 24M & 3.6M & 85\% \\
|
|
Dilithium-2 verify & 21M & 3.8M & 82\% \\
|
|
Dilithium-3 verify & 22M & 4.1M & 81\% \\
|
|
STARK verify (64K) & 45M & 15M & 67\% \\
|
|
\bottomrule
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
\end{table}
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Comparison with Native Implementations}
|
|
|
|
\begin{table}[h]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\caption{EVM vs Native Performance Ratio}
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lrrr}
|
|
\toprule
|
|
Operation & Native ($\mu$s) & EVM (ms) & Overhead \\
|
|
\midrule
|
|
NTT-512 & 50 & 120 & 2,400$\times$ \\
|
|
FALCON verify & 200 & 350 & 1,750$\times$ \\
|
|
ML-DSA verify & 250 & 400 & 1,600$\times$ \\
|
|
\bottomrule
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
\end{table}
|
|
|
|
While EVM overhead remains significant, our optimizations bring post-quantum cryptography within practical limits.
|
|
|