Files
zeekay abf99d05fc papers: reorganize into per-paper dirs, add Antje Worring as co-author
Restructured from flat .tex/.pdf files into per-paper subdirectories.
Added Antje Worring as co-author on all papers.
Synced PDFs to pdfs/ for download site.
2026-04-18 21:50:07 -07:00

33 lines
1.7 KiB
TeX

\section{Introduction}
\label{sec:introduction}
The security of every major blockchain rests on the hardness of the discrete logarithm
problem (DLP) on elliptic curves. Bitcoin uses ECDSA on secp256k1. Ethereum uses
ECDSA on secp256k1 for transactions and BLS12-381 for consensus. Lux uses BLS12-381
for consensus, ECDSA for C-Chain transactions, and EdDSA for bridge operations.
Shor's algorithm~\cite{shor1997} solves DLP in polynomial time on a quantum computer,
breaking all of these schemes simultaneously.
This paper is not about whether quantum computers will eventually break blockchain
cryptography---they will, given sufficient scale. It is about \emph{when} and
\emph{how}, and what the consequences are for systems that do not prepare.
The central argument is that blockchain is \emph{uniquely} vulnerable to quantum
attack compared to other cryptographic systems, for three reasons:
\begin{enumerate}[leftmargin=2em]
\item \textbf{Permanent public record}: Every signature ever produced is stored
on-chain forever. There is no concept of session expiry.
\item \textbf{Harvest-now-decrypt-later}: An adversary need not have a quantum
computer today. Recording signed transactions and public keys today is
sufficient to mount attacks years later.
\item \textbf{Economic persistence}: Unlike a TLS session protecting a single
HTTP request, blockchain signatures protect assets that may appreciate in
value over decades.
\end{enumerate}
%% ========================================================================
%% 2. SHOR'S ALGORITHM: IMPACT ON BLOCKCHAIN PRIMITIVES
%% ========================================================================